Closed Bug 293623 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

Page is always displayed from cache with old data even refresh button is pressed and new content is available

Categories

(Firefox :: General, defect)

1.0 Branch
x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: drinsoft, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it-IT; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 Firefox/1.0.3 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it-IT; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 Firefox/1.0.3 The site at URL "http://www.beppegrillo.it" is an italian blog, which is frequently updated. I ran Firefox in a computer connected to a network, thru a firewall which uses Wingate v. 6, on Windows 2000 Server. The problem is that the page is always displayed from cache with old data even refresh button is pressed and new content is available. Actually I solved the problem by accessing the blog with Internet Explorer, then pushing the refresh button, then new data are loaded. From that moment onwards, Firefox too shows new data by pressing the refresh button. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open Firefox and go to URL www.beppegrillo.it 2. Push Firefox refresh button 3. Open Internet explorer and go to URL www.beppegrillo.it 4. Push Internet Explorer refresh button 5. See that the browser shows new data than Firefox. Expected Results: It seems that Firefox do not really send the request of update to Wingate engine while the refresh button is pressed, so the old data is still showed.
You probably need to check the FAQ sheet and other troubleshooting resources for Firefox. Does shift refresh do what you want? Having said that, your page does send correct Expires and Modified headers. My Firefox sends this request for a plain refresh: GET http://www.beppegrillo.it/ HTTP/1.1 Host: www.beppegrillo.it User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0+ Accept: text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5 Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 300 Proxy-Connection: keep-alive If-Modified-Since: Thu, 12 May 2005 05:37:43 GMT If-None-Match: "4f5865-c61a-4282eba7" Cache-Control: max-age=0 which looks 100% correct to me. Are you sure that your proxy properly understands HTTP 1.1, and that it is sending an IMS request. Is the data you are seeing coming from Firefox's cache or Wingate's cache? Does your proxy send X-Cache headers which might help you diagnose the problem? If there is a problem with wingate, then it should be docuemnted, and perhaps Firefox should warn ...
(In reply to comment #1) > You probably need to check the FAQ sheet and other troubleshooting resources > for Firefox. > > Does shift refresh do what you want? > > Having said that, your page does send correct Expires and Modified headers. > My Firefox sends this request for a plain refresh: > > GET http://www.beppegrillo.it/ HTTP/1.1 > Host: www.beppegrillo.it > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8b2) > Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0+ > Accept: > text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5 > Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5 > Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate > Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 > Keep-Alive: 300 > Proxy-Connection: keep-alive > If-Modified-Since: Thu, 12 May 2005 05:37:43 GMT > If-None-Match: "4f5865-c61a-4282eba7" > Cache-Control: max-age=0 > > which looks 100% correct to me. Are you sure that your proxy properly > understands HTTP 1.1, and that it is sending an IMS request. > > Is the data you are seeing coming from Firefox's cache or Wingate's > cache? > > Does your proxy send X-Cache headers which might help you diagnose the > problem? > > If there is a problem with wingate, then it should be docuemnted, and perhaps > Firefox should warn ... Yes, shift refresh solved the problem! Now, what's the difference between simply refresh and shift refresh? Thanks in advance for your advice! Best Regards Campanelli Paolo
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Version: unspecified → 1.0 Branch
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.