Closed
Bug 293851
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
When reinstalling Firefox, the homepage is changed by default
Categories
(Firefox :: Installer, defect)
Firefox
Installer
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 263595
People
(Reporter: tonymec, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4 When installing over an existing Firefox profile, the user needs to manually uncheck "Make Firefox Start my home page" in the last page of the installer if he wants to keep his user-set homepage. IMHO the default behaviour ought to leave user preferences (including home page or home page group) unchanged. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Have an existing version of Firefox installed 2. Set the home page in Tools -> Options -> General 3a. Reinstall Firefox (e.g., upgrading to new version) 3b. Do not change the settings in the last page of the installer Actual Results: Home page changed, shows a Google menu. Expected Results: Home page should not change. IMHO the default for "Make Firefox Start my home page" should be unchecked by default, at least if there already exists a profile with a user-set homepage. I'm not lowering the bug severity to less than "Normal" because I believe the fix is easy.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 263595 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 263595 *** Bug 263595 is exclusively a Trunk-build bug at the moment. I have noticed this behaviour on Aviary-branch builds (including the build used to report this bug, and, I've been told, the new "1.0.4 release" build which is, IIUC, almost or exactly identical to mine). I suggest that one of the following courses of action be followed: a. Marking bug 263595 as "Version: Unspecified" instead of "Version: Trunk"; b. Mentioning the equivalent aviary-branch bug (if there is one) in the comments for bug 263595; c. If there is no equivalent aviary-branch bug, and the people responsible for bug 263595 won't accept their bug to apply also to aviary builds, then reopening this one and marking it "Version: aviary" and (since 1.0.4 is out) "blocking-aviary1.0.5?" Pike, what do you think?
(In reply to comment #2) > Bug 263595 is exclusively a Trunk-build bug at the moment. I have noticed this > behaviour on Aviary-branch builds (including the build used to report this bug, > and, I've been told, the new "1.0.4 release" build which is, IIUC, almost or > exactly identical to mine). > > I suggest that one of the following courses of action be followed: > > a. Marking bug 263595 as "Version: Unspecified" instead of "Version: Trunk"; > b. Mentioning the equivalent aviary-branch bug (if there is one) in the comments > for bug 263595; > c. If there is no equivalent aviary-branch bug, and the people responsible for > bug 263595 won't accept their bug to apply also to aviary builds, then reopening > this one and marking it "Version: aviary" and (since 1.0.4 is out) > "blocking-aviary1.0.5?" > > Pike, what do you think? I don't think it's appropriate to have separate bugs for separate releases (especially for non-critical stuff like this) unless each release requires a different fix. I'm not sure why the other bug was marked as Trunk since it was "blocking" Firefox 1.0.3 at the time.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) [...] > I don't think it's appropriate to have separate bugs for separate releases > (especially for non-critical stuff like this) unless each release requires a > different fix. I'm not sure why the other bug was marked as Trunk since it was > "blocking" Firefox 1.0.3 at the time. Well, one of the latest comments to that other bug -- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263595#c30 -- seems to imply that the fix should be different for trunk vs. branch; I don't understand why. I still believe that that checkbox ought to default off in all cases: wouldn't the fix to that be a one-liner?
(In reply to comment #4) > Well, one of the latest comments to that other bug -- > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263595#c30 -- seems to imply that > the fix should be different for trunk vs. branch; I don't understand why. I > still believe that that checkbox ought to default off in all cases: wouldn't the > fix to that be a one-liner? AIUI they want to turn the checkbox on for new installs but off for existing ones, until they get a proper fix for 1.1 they're just going to manually modify the patches that are put on the update system. Let's wait for a response on the other bug, I don't intend to reopen this one since I think duping it was the right call but I'll leave it to someone more familiar with this issue to decide for certain.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) [...] > Let's wait for a response on the other bug, I don't intend to reopen this one > since I think duping it was the right call but I'll leave it to someone more > familiar with this issue to decide for certain. > OK.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•