Closed
Bug 294850
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Checking cached vote counts should use the friendlier format :)
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Extensions, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: timeless, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: ue)
steps:
load sanitycheck (with an insane system, might i suggest bmo?)
actual results (inconsistency):
Checking cached vote counts
Bad vote cache for bug 262005
Bad vote cache for bug 291593
Click here to rebuild the vote cache
4 bug(s) found with incorrect keyword cache: 291074, 291244, 291621, 294529 (as
buglist)
expected results:
no inconsistencies among output for various categories of problems
while i'm listing inconsistencies, (this can be split into another bug if people
don't think i've filed enough bugzilla bugs already...)
the following items (visual inspection) do not include a numeric prefix
indicating the number of "bug(s)" found:
Bug(s) found on duplicates table that are not marked duplicate:
Bugs with confirmed status but don't have everconfirmed set:
Bugs that have enough votes to be confirmed but haven't been:
Bugs that have changes but no mail sent for at least half an hour:
additional expected results: I should not see (s) in output, we know the number
so we should pass there right Terms.bug/Terms.bugs.
Lastly, i think i'd rather:
Found X bug[s] {blah}: ##, ##, (as buglist)
Updated•19 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: administration → extensions
Component: Administration → Extensions
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
The voting functionality will be replaced with emoji comment reactions in the near future.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•