Closed
Bug 295084
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
need to move RFC 2047 (and 2231) encoding routines out of mailnews
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: jshin1987, Assigned: jshin1987)
References
(Blocks 2 open bugs)
Details
(Keywords: intl)
RFC 2047 and RFC 2231 encoding routines are needed outside mailnews. For instance, RFC 2388 specify that RFC 2047 encoding be used for name and filename parameters of Content-Disposition header field (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2388 ) [1] in multipart/form-data. RFC 2047/2231 decoding routines were moved to necko out of mailnews 2 years ago. We may have to extend or revise the interface (for decoding) to support encoding. Btw, there's a bug depending on this bug, but I forgot which one is. [1] I think it's an error to say that RFC 2047 be used, but perhaps it's too late to fix it.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Summary: need to move RFC 2047 (and 2231) encoding routines out of mailnews → need to move RFC 2047 (and 2231) encoding routines out of mailnews
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > RFC 2047 and RFC 2231 encoding routines are needed outside mailnews. For > instance, RFC 2388 specify that RFC 2047 encoding be used for name and filename > parameters of Content-Disposition header field (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2388 > ) [1] in multipart/form-data. I thought RFC 2388 says that name (from a field name in the form) in Content-Type disposition header may use RFC 2047 encoding and RFC 2231 encoding mighe be used for file names when there is file input/upload in multipart/form.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Indeed. I found, in another bug, that RFC 2388 has such a provision after writing my previous comment. Thanks for your reminder, though.
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
I think this bug can be closed.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•