Developers should be able to see the queue of extensions awaiting review/approval just as reviewers and administrators currently can (and as developers can in the b.m.o request queue). Besides giving greater transparency to the review process generally, this change would let developers see where their extension is in the queue of extensions being processed and how quickly similar extensions are being processed.
Just like Bugzilla, items are not processed sequentially.
Target Milestone: 1.0 → ---
(In reply to comment #1) > Just like Bugzilla, items are not processed sequentially. Sure, but it's still possible to glean useful information from the queue about how long it'll take for an extension to be approved by looking at the approval times for previously-approved extensions that are similar (f.e. for the same app, or the same platform, or of similar size and complexity). For example, I've heard that it takes about two days for Firefox extensions and four days for Thunderbird extensions to be approved. My Forumzilla extension has been in the queue for nine days, however, so today I started asking questions about its status. If I had had access to the queue, I would have been able to determine for myself that extensions like mine (for both Thunderbird and Seamonkey, cross-platform, large and complicated, etc.) take more time than the "average", and I wouldn't have had to bother people with questions about it to find it out, and I would've known it nine days ago. I'm not suggesting reviewers should process the queue sequentially. I understand that such a practice may not be ideal, especially given the dearth of reviewer resources. It would be useful, however, not just for my situation, but for other situations as well, and so that developers have a better sense of the process in general, if developers had access to the queue.
Title, Date, Works With Anything else?
Status, Reviewer, and Date Reviewed (as opposed to Date Submitted) would also be useful for extensions that have already been reviewed. I realize that this bug was originally framed as a request for access to the pending queue, but the purpose of the bug (greater transparency about the process) is best served by providing access to the set of items already reviewed as well (just as the Bugzilla request queue provides access to satisfied requests, although it does not display such requests by default).
Please file a second bug for those already reviewed. actually, thats probably Bug 255305.
Summary: developers should be able to see queue of extensions awaiting review → [Approval Queue] developers should be able to see queue of extensions awaiting review
Mass change - bugs to be read / (re)confirmed.
Assignee: Bugzilla-alanjstrBugs → nobody
Priority: -- → P5
AMO bugspam. Correcting QA contacts on OLD bugs (firstname.lastname@example.org) -> Correct QA contact (email@example.com) Filtermeplzkthx
QA Contact: mozilla.update → developers
Summary: [Approval Queue] developers should be able to see queue of extensions awaiting review → [Approval Queue] developers should be able to see queue of add-ons awaiting review
Component: Developer Pages → Admin/Reviewer Tools
QA Contact: developers → admin-tools
Version: unspecified → 1.0
Myk: we now have the total length of the review queue shown to all developers. Given the wide variance of review latencies for different add-ons, I'm not sure there's a lot to be gained by exposing more of the detail -- if you agree, can you WFM or WONTFIX this, depending on your whim?
(In reply to comment #8) > Myk: we now have the total length of the review queue shown to all > developers. Given the wide variance of review latencies for different > add-ons, I'm not sure there's a lot to be gained by exposing more of the > detail -- if you agree, can you WFM or WONTFIX this, depending on your whim? If the queue won't enlighten developers about the status of their add-on, then there's no reason to spend the time to show it. Nevertheless, showing the total length of the review queue doesn't seem like a big improvement, given the wide variance you cite. Anecdotally, I saw total lengths of ~350 and ~75 on two recent occasions when I uploaded two different versions of an add-on, and the time to review didn't vary significantly between them (but perhaps this is because that particular add-on is simple and small, thus easy to review). One thought is to additionally show the run rate (incoming add-ons and outgoing reviews per day/week), although this again falls into the variance trap. No mean statistic will be very reliable when the range is large and distribution across it is significant. So maybe the reality is that there is no very useful metric (or none which is easily implementable and without painful opportunity costs). In any case, it sounds like revealing the queue is not the solution, so I'll WONTFIX this bug for now and open a new bug later if I think of some other good way to provide useful information for add-ons developers.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.