Open
Bug 296233
Opened 20 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
Investigate sending ascii-only mail with no charset specified
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Composition, defect)
MailNews Core
Composition
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: bzbarsky, Unassigned)
References
Details
It looks like we don't send ASCII-only mail as ascii because OE failed to deal with that (bug 247958). Does the OE problem also arise if instead of explicitly specifying us-ascii we specify no charset at all? Per the relevant RFC, that should be treated like us-ascii, and since the content will be all ASCII there should be no ambiguities on the receiving side anyway. But there's a chance the OE actually treats the two differently as far as replying (the problem in bug 247958) goes. If sending no charset doesn't break OE, I would suggest doing that and removing the preference that bug 247958 introduced (or at least changing its default value).
Updated•16 years ago
|
QA Contact: composition
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Havne't seen any other bugs about this, so I assume the current way works pretty well? Boris?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
It depends on how you define "well". I really hate getting the Chinese fonts' idea of Latin text as a reader just because the default encoding of the sender is Big5, even if the actual text is all ASCII... There's also the fact that doing what this bug suggests, if feasible, would be closer to the relevant RFC than what we do now.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•