Open
Bug 296598
Opened 20 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
Allow for advanced challenge/response authentication (optical flickering)
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Security, enhancement)
Thunderbird
Security
Tracking
(Not tracked)
UNCONFIRMED
People
(Reporter: hauser, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4 Once that Bug 249240 is fixed, it will be possible to use this for challenge response protocols (provided the server error message is displayed). Modern devices, however, do not require the user to copy the challenge by typing off the challenge from the screen. It should be possible to use more advanced forms such as flickering as per http://axsionics.com/s_optical_interface.html Reproducible: Always Expected Results: An easy way would be to interpret for example the first four letters of the POP server error string sent back and start a challenge-display-plugin (better even a default shipped flickering viewer)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
see also Bug 268835
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
enabling to use thunderbird with two-factor auth and alike is still a desire
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: EXPIRED → ---
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
This seems to me to be far enough outside the realm of normal E-Mail use that it'll be a wontfix. But, more immediately, the URL describing what you'd like to see implemented doesn't work any more. Could you update that, please? Also, if you could give us an example or two of an E-Mail server that implements what you're suggesting, I think that will help.
Whiteboard: closeme 2008-09-04
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
This report is too underspecified for me to make a judgment. The key piece seems to be defined in a URI that no longer works, and I'm not sure if this is supposed to be some form of SASL-based authentication or not. In lieu of more information, RESO INCO.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
A newer URL is http://www.axsionics.ch/tce/frame/main/422.htm - we are working on that on our smtp/imap server. And we would appreciate how MUA creators plan to handle 3-factor authentication.
Resolution: INCOMPLETE → FIXED
Updated•16 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Whiteboard: closeme 2008-09-04
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
This sounds like something that would be handled (in the protocol) via some form of SASL-based authentication. If that is true, then this is really a dupe of bug 400212. If not (via an entirely new IMAP command), then this is probably WONTFIX. Thoughts, bienvenu?
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
No, bug 400212 is more about lessening the duplication of code in various protocols' sasl implementations. Either way, we'd need to write code in IMAP to handle this, I would think.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: dveditz → nobody
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•