Closed
Bug 296832
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
need a synchronous interface to the storage provider
Categories
(Calendar :: Provider: Local Storage, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: mvl, Unassigned)
Details
I'm planning to use the storage calendar for the cache. The code is getting really unreadable due to the async nature of calICalendar. I suggest to add a calISynchronousCalendar interface, only implemented by the storage calendar, and only to be used by the cache. Then code can look like this: var orig = cachecal.getItem(id) othercal.addItem(orig); instead of some long unreadable code with listeners. (and cache needs to work with 3 calendars in other places, where the code will be totally unreadable)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
This is some other (pseudo)code i need:
var items = origcal.getItems(ALL);
for each (item in items) {
var cacheitem = cachecal.getItems(item.id);
if (cacheitem) {
// do stuff with cacheitem
}
}
with the async api, it needs two listeners, and the code-flow would be a
mystery. Also you don't want to hammer the provider with a ton of requests in
the loop before there is an answer. Preventing that async is a pain.Assignee: vladimir → nobody
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
mvl, since we now have a tagging interface calISyncCalendar for the exact same purpose you described in this bug, isn't this one obsolete now?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Yeah, I guess so.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•