Closed
Bug 296853
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
100% cpu usage on printing of the page
Categories
(Core :: Printing: Output, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: m_e_my_self, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
172.12 KB,
application/octet-stream
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4 If you open the site and get the article (not the registering request, if it does that try to go via google ( http://www.google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2005%2F06%2F03%2Fscience%2F03cell.html%3Fincamp%3Darticle_popular&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official ) and click on the first link to actually see the article) Then File-Print, you get the box, press ok and firefox hangs Windows 2000 sp4 and printing other sites works fine with the exact same settings/printers. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to the actual article (not register request!) 2. File-print-ok 3. Hangs Actual Results: 100%cpu usage, need to kill ff in task mangger Expected Results: Printed :)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
It requires the folder to not print; if you rename the folder it prints fine. With folder it'll hang, so I think it might be a js issue?
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
You whole win2k hangs or only Firefox ? And please don't report Gecko bugs from such old builds. The Gecko in FF1.0.4 is over 12 months old. Please retest with a current developer nightly build.
Assignee: nobody → printing
Component: General → Printing
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general
Version: unspecified → 1.7 Branch
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
I downloaded what I think is the nightly (called deer park right?) and it prints fine, so I guess it's an invalid bug?
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
worksforme would be ok (fails in older build but worksforme in a new one). verified and thanks for your update !
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•