298364 - Implement DOM Level 3 DOMImplementation

Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

Description

[Olli Pettay [:smaug][[e-mail]]]

I may need DOMImplementation::getFeature(...) soon.
Patch coming.

Comment 1

[Olli Pettay [:smaug][[e-mail]]]

Attachment: v1

Comment 2

[Olli Pettay [:smaug][[e-mail]]]

Peter, would
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-DOM-Level-3-LS-20040407/load-save.html#LS-DOMImplementation
be a good reason to implement/support this ;)

Comment 3

[Peter Van der Beken [:peterv]]

Comment on attachment 186931 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

>Index: dom/src/base/nsDOMClassInfo.cpp
>===================================================================

> // includes needed for the prototype chain interfaces
> #include "nsIDOMNavigator.h"
> #include "nsIDOMBarProp.h"
> #include "nsIDOMScreen.h"
> #include "nsIDOMDocumentType.h"
> #include "nsIDOMDOMImplementation.h"
>+#include "nsIDOM3DOMImplementation.h"

You can remove

 #include "nsIDOMDOMImplementation.h"

now. And I still think this is unneeded bloat but whatever.

Comment 4

[Olli Pettay [:smaug][[e-mail]]]

Comment on attachment 186931 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

Well, maybe jst could decide whether this is really bloat (and especially
unneeded bloat) ;)

Comment 5

[Hixie (not reading bugmail)]

I'm with peterv on this... Also, I would consider DOM3LS to be WONTFIX. See the
discussion on bug 155749.

Comment 6

[Olli Pettay [:smaug][[e-mail]]]

Comment on attachment 186931 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

clearing sr request. I don't need this atm

Comment 7

[:Ms2ger (he/him; ⌚ UTC+1/+2)]

WONTFIX?

Comment 8

[Jonas Sicking (:sicking) No longer reading bugmail consistently]

I agree. We should reinvestigate once DOM WebCore is in a more stable state and make sure that the features that stay in there stay there for a good reason.

Comment 9

[Olli Pettay [:smaug][[e-mail]]]

Agree. (and about reinvestigating... need to also make sure that useful features
aren't removed from DOM in DOM WebCore)