Closed
Bug 298937
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
TARGET_XPCOM_ABI not set in Mac OSX builds
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: darin.moz, Assigned: darin.moz)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
697 bytes,
patch
|
cls
:
review+
benjamin
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
TARGET_XPCOM_ABI not set in Mac OSX builds
It turns out that this is because CPU_ARCH is not getting set, and it is not
getting set because $(uname -m) evaluates to "Power Macintosh" instead of
"powerpc", which is what configure.in expects.
I've created a simple patch for this, but Chase noted that $(uname -p) does
indeed result in "powerpc". However, I'm not sure that we can use that since we
have a bit of a chicken-and-the-egg problem here.
This bug is blocking the new update service.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #187418 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Darin, I'm not sure that approach will be compatible with the x86 Macs. How
about fixing up OS_TEST to be `uname -p` on Darwin as is done with a variety of
other OSes?
Attachment #187428 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #187418 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #187418 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 187428 [details] [diff] [review]
More portable? (untested)
Yeah, I like this patch better. Thanks!
Attachment #187428 -
Flags: superreview?(benjamin)
Attachment #187428 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Attachment #187428 -
Flags: review+
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 187428 [details] [diff] [review]
More portable? (untested)
r=me, though I would really like cls to comment if possible.
Attachment #187428 -
Flags: superreview?(benjamin) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #187428 -
Flags: review+ → review?(cls)
Attachment #187428 -
Flags: review?(cls) → review+
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 187428 [details] [diff] [review]
More portable? (untested)
I'll land this.
Attachment #187428 -
Flags: approval1.8b3+
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Checked in for 1.8b3
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Core → Firefox Build System
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•