Closed
Bug 299191
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Signature below reply doesn't add dashes when replying to mail
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Message Compose Window, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: hacksoncode, Assigned: mscott)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050609 Firefox/1.0+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050609 Firefox/1.0+ I decided to try out having my .sig file be above the quoted material to see how it worked, and I discovered this strange behavior. If you hit "Ctrl-R" to reply to a message, the .sig file is added with no "--" line above it. However, if you hit "Ctrl-M" to create a new message, the "--" is added. This doesn't happen with the default .sig below quote setting. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Change Composition preferences to Automatically quote, start my reply above the quote, and place my signature below my reply (above the quote). 2. Create a new message with Ctrl-M 3. Reply to a message with Ctrl-R Actual Results: Ctrl-M opens a window with "--" above the .sig, and Ctrl-R opens one with no "--". Expected Results: Consistent results. I could work around either having it always add the "--" or never adding the "--", but having it do one sometimes and the other sometimes is quite frustrating. Account is IMAP. Thunderbird version 1.0+ (20050629). I have a reasonably quirky local folder arrangement, but I don't see how that could have any effect.
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
This is as designed. Including the "-- " on when top-replying would make everything under it part of the sig. There was a *lengthy* discussion about this in bug 62429.
Gods, what a mess. Is there a pref to turn off the "--" entirely, so that at least it's consistent? I will say, though, that now that we have separate settings for this stuff per account, that it might make sense to revisit this idea. For business email, reply above, quote below is a useful scheme. It's bad news in news, so don't do it in news...??? Anyway, it doesn't seem worth fighting for, so I'll resolve it. If someone knows the answer to my pref question above I'd still appreciate a reply...
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 311888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•