Closed Bug 301277 Opened 20 years ago Closed 18 years ago

Linux installation instructions

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect)

All
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: guillomovitch, Assigned: guillomovitch)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 2 obsolete files)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050512 Firefox/1.0.4 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050512 Firefox/1.0.4 The installation guide has a section about Mandrake 8.0, which is quite outdated. And there is no mention of other Linux distributions, such as Debian, whereas just running apt-get install bugzilla is enough. Rather than updating it, I rewrote it in a more general fashion for all Linux distributions. Reproducible: Always
Attached patch Patch for installation guide (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #189747 - Flags: review?
> Most Linux distributions includes a package for bugzilla This may be a bit too general as a comment. Fedora doesn't have a Bugzilla package, Ubuntu's is in the universe repo which isn't enabled by default.
Well, feel free to add a chapter on manual installation. Anyway, this is already less general than previous situation, which was only about Mandriva 8.0.
Suggest confirming. There doesn't seem to be any other open linux-install-notes bugs (of course, I may be wrong). It would be nice to see some general Linux (or even general UNIX) install instructions, with distro-specific sections as warranted. However, the generic bit is a good start. Reporter, assuming that your installation instructions are still up-to-date, you should request review from 'documentation@bugzilla.bugs' to get a review on your patch.
Unless I'm mistaken, you should ask review from documentation@bugzilla.bugs for docs related patches. "<command>urpmi</command> bugzilla on Mandriva" should be "<command>urpmi bugzilla</command> on Mandriva", right?
Assignee: documentation → guillomovitch
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment on attachment 189747 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for installation guide In addition to Marc's suggestion regarding "<command>urpmi</command> bugzilla", probably we need proper capitalization of the "Bugzilla" word in: "includes a package for bugzilla"
Attachment #189747 - Flags: review? → review-
Attached patch Corrected patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #189747 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #196236 - Flags: review?(documentation)
Comment on attachment 196236 [details] [diff] [review] Corrected patch >+ <para>Most Linux distributions includes a package for Bugzilla, >+ intended to run out of the box. Just run standard package >+ installer for the one you use (aka <command>urpmi >+ bugzilla</command> on Mandriva, <command>apt-get install >+ bugzilla</command> on Debian, etc...) and follow >+ post-installation procedure. I have the following comments: "includes" should probably be "include" "Just run standard" should probably be "Just run the standard" "aka" should probably be "for example" "and follow post-installation" should probably be "and follow any post-installation procedures" Most Linux distributions include a package for Bugzilla, intended to run out of the box. Just run the standard package installer for the one you use (for example <command>urpmi bugzilla</command> on Mandriva, <command>apt-get install bugzilla</command> on Debian, etc...) and follow any post-installation procedures.
Attachment #196236 - Flags: review?(documentation) → review-
Attached patch Updated patchSplinter Review
Attachment #196236 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #202019 - Flags: review?(documentation)
Comment on attachment 202019 [details] [diff] [review] Updated patch As was previously mentioned, it would probably be best to change the word "Most" to something else, probably many. I know this is a nit, but a very large part of the Bugzilla community uses Redhat-based installations. Redhat doesn't include Bugzilla packaging at this time. According to (I think it was boardwatch) a resource I read recently, over 50% of those using Linux use either RHEL or Fedora Core. Also, looking at the decision to remove the instructions for Mandrake, I think it would be wise to leave the Mandrake section as-is (unless it's outdated) and add a Linux (General) section above. I believe this will help the largest number of people. Hence, the review-. Apart from those comments, your updates look good. Someone commented that we should have a manual install section to the documentation. I agree. I don't think that should keep us from approving this upate, however.
Attachment #202019 - Flags: review?(documentation) → review-
(In reply to comment #10) > (From update of attachment 202019 [details] [diff] [review] [edit]) > As was previously mentioned, it would probably be best to change the word > "Most" to something else, probably many. I know this is a nit, but a very > large part of the Bugzilla community uses Redhat-based installations. Redhat > doesn't include Bugzilla packaging at this time. According to (I think it was > boardwatch) a resource I read recently, over 50% of those using Linux use > either RHEL or Fedora Core. Agreed, feel free to do the change. > Also, looking at the decision to remove the instructions for Mandrake, I think > it would be wise to leave the Mandrake section as-is (unless it's outdated) and > add a Linux (General) section above. I believe this will help the largest > number of people. I disagree. I don't find any advantage to keep initial phrasing, wich seems to say that only mandrake 8.0 (which is really old) has everything needed. I prefer the more general formulation I submitted, which include Mandrake (all versions).
I have recently successfully installed Bugzilla 3.0 on Ubuntu and 3.1.1 on Centos and recommend the following additions the bellow line needs to added to the httpd.conf (replacing the Bugzilla path of course): ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/var/www/bugzilla-3.1.1/" On a clean install of linux, GD will not install, it looks for libgd because it is not installed. I had great trouble finding answers to this: The below should be added: Extra C and h libraries files must installed before any GD program can be installed. Debian (Ubuntu) systems use “apt-get libc6-dev” and “apt-get install libgd-gd2-perl” Redhat (Fedora/Centos) systems use “yum install gd-devel” Also I found it easer to do a manual install rather then to use the package offered by Ubuntu, maybe just me though. Redhat (Fedora/Centos) systems use “yum install gd-devel”
In another bug we decided to move all distro-specific notes to the wiki. The user guide has been updated with this link. Please add distro-specific notes to this page: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Linux_Distro_Installation -Sam
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
There's already an Ubuntu page in the Wiki--you might want to move the info to that page.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: