301673 - DOM Inspector of Seamonkey is broken. Error: undefined entity File: chrome://inspector/content/tasksOverlay.xul Source Code: <menuitem id="menu_inspector" label="&inspectorTaskCmd.label;"

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 301565

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)

Description

[WADA:World Anti-bad-Duping Agency]

Build: seamonkey/nightly/latest-trunk 2005072106(ZIP build,Win-2K)
"DOM Inspector" menu is not available in Tools/Web Development.

Error message in JavaScript Console:
 Error: undefined entity
  Source File: chrome://inspector/content/tasksOverlay.xul Line: 20, Column: 5
  Source Code: <menuitem id="menu_inspector" label="&inspectorTaskCmd.label;"
Next error is also dislayed in status bar field.
     <menuitem id="menu_inspector" label="&inspectorTaskCmd.label;"
  ----^

No problem on Seamonkey trunk 2005071805 build.
No problem too on firefox/nightly/latest-trunk 20050721 build.
(Note: DOM Inspector on Firefox was not placed in Tools/Web Developement)

Possibly caused by patch for Bug 301252.  
> Bug 301252 : remove "browser/extensions/inspector/Makefile" entries from
allmakefiles.

Comment 1

[Hermann Schwab]

Bug 301565 Bottom part of suite display gray with script showing. on all Windows

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 301565 ***

Comment 2

[WADA:World Anti-bad-Duping Agency]

(In reply to comment #1)
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 301565 ***
If DUPed, I prefer DUP of Bug 301532, which seems to be the first one in the
world :-)

By the way, how can I find DUP(s) by initial search for string(s) in summary?
(I know I should have searched bugs with "inspector" in comment, which are
updated in these days...)

>Bug 301532 : Bottom edge of browser frame is very wide and has red text written
on it, see Summary
>Bug 301565 : Bottom part of suite display gray with script showing. on all Windows
>Bug 301632 : Bottom frame of Seamonkey is too wide and has red text and symbols
upon it
> Bug 301644 : Saw this with 0721 build

Hermann, could you please modify summary of the bug to searchable one.

Comment 3

[Hermann Schwab]

(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 301565 ***
> If DUPed, I prefer DUP of Bug 301532, which seems to be the first one in the
> world :-)

Yes, and normally it should be duped to this one, but the later bug got
confirmed first, resolved fixed, so the other bugs were duped to that one.

> By the way, how can I find DUP(s) by initial search for string(s) in summary?
I'm not a native speaker, sometimes I succeed finding something ;-)


> Hermann, could you please modify summary of the bug to searchable one.

No need, you've got the searchable summary on your bug, and so the bug were it
is duped to can be found.