Closed
Bug 302190
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
XHTML forms are not cached in the same way that HTML forms are.
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jtate, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
369 bytes,
application/xhtml+xml
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050618 Firefox/1.0.4
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050618 Firefox/1.0.4
An XML based form, when filled, does not cache the values on a refresh (Ctl-R
not Ctl-Shift-R) or on a back operation from another page as an HTML form will.
It appears that the Content-Types text/xml and application/xhtml+xml do not go
down the form value caching path that text/html forms do. As XHTMl becomes more
and more prevalent this will cause more and more problems.
I should note that konqueror caches xhtml form data as one would expect.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Copy the soon to be attached index.xhtml file to your DocumentRoot
2. Load index.xhtml into a browser
3. Add some data to either of the two text input fields
4. Hit the refresh button
Actual Results:
The form data was cleared.
Expected Results:
The form data should have remained intact.
Ctl-Shift-R should be used to "reset" a form.
I plan on reproducing with Firefox 1.0.6 as soon as I am able. I will provide
results here.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Here is the promised xhtml form.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
This problem still occurs in version 1.0.6.
Version: unspecified → 1.0 Branch
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050726 Firefox/1.0+
ID:2005072612
Works for me. The code used in 1.0.x is almost 16 months old; you need to be
able to reproduce this in the latest builds for it to be valid.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
The bug also occurs in Mozilla 1.7.
You are correct Adam. This bug does not occur in Deer Park. Any chance for a
back port?
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> Any chance for a back port?
Nope. Only security fixes are checked into the aviary branch.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•