Closed
Bug 302745
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
talkback.xpi is (almost) empty in 1.7.11 linux release
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: hugues.fournier, Assigned: chase)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050722 Firefox/1.0.6
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728
In the 1.7.11 linux i686 release, talkback.xpi only contains install.js.
This is causing a -214 error (DOES_NOT_EXIST) when addDirectory("Program",
"1.7.11", "bin", communicatorFolder, "", true ) is called in install.js as bin
doesn't exist in the archive, and the user get a -201 error (UNEXPECTED_ERROR)
in the installer.
(For this reason, in the french l10n version of the installer , I chose to
comment out the talkback component in the config.ini file)
I had to comment the installation
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download the linux installer (or stub-installer)
2. Install it
Actual Results:
When the talkback component is being installed, the installer returns a -201
error (not fatal for the installation) because of this almost empty
Expected Results:
The talkback xpi should have installed seamlessly.
Relevant install log lines:
Quality Feedback Utility (version 1.7.11)
------------------------
** initInstall: 0
** communicatorFolder: /home/hugues/mozilla-test/
** addDirectory() returned: -214
** cancelInstall() returned: -214
Install **FAILED** with error -214 -- 2005-07-30 07:19:40| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728 Despite the UA I wrote, this is affecting en-US version too. (Sorry for the noise)
Version: unspecified → 1.7 Branch
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
mozilla/nightly/2005-07-28-07-1.7/linux-xpi talkback.xpi 28-Jul-2005 16:57 1.1K mozilla/nightly/2005-07-29-11-1.7/linux-xpi talkback.xpi 29-Jul-2005 21:42 781K but the parent directory holds nothing but linux-xpi: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/nightly/2005-07-29-11-1.7/
Assignee: xpi-packages → nobody
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Installer: XPI Packages → Build Config
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: build-config
Updated•19 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.7.11?
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
It is not yet announced, didn`t see it a planet.mozilla.org, mozillazine, etc. Mozilla.org offers download of 1.7.10, http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/ offers 1.7.8 (don't know which mirror that is), Bug seen in: http://mozilla.osuosl.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.7.11/linux-xpi/ talkback.xpi 29-Jul-2005 18:21 1.1K Could this yet be stopped, or the correct talkback.xpi loaded?
Severity: normal → critical
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
It was announced, inofficially: Mozilla 1.7.11 has been released MozillaZine Forum Index -> SeaMonkey Builds http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=1640858#1640858 There are no relnotes yet, maybe there should be a short note about the missing talkback on Linux.
Hi, And It appears to be missing in the Linux tar.gz http://mozilla.isc.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.7.11/mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-1.7.11.tar.gz build too. It seems to be missing in the linux builds all together.
Hi, I was just looking into this more and it looks like it could be a build machine configuration problem. Could someone please check that tinderbox.?
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → chase
Hi, I am requesting blocking 1.7.12 becuse of a tinderbox issue Look at ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/tinderbox-builds/maple-1.7/linux-xpi It is also having the 1.1 talkback.xpi file.
Flags: blocking1.7.12?
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
Or http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/tinderbox-builds/maple-1.7/linux-xpi Please use this link instead. These are the tinderbox builds.
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10) > These are the tinderbox builds. Usually tinderbox builds are delivered with dummy talkback.xpi, not the real thing. The exemption is the tinderbox build which will be delivered as nightly. if the windows-xpi or linux-xpi directory is showing the dummy talkback.xpi, a few kb instead of a few hundred kb, talkback isnΒ΄t packaged in all versions for that os, zip, installer, netinstaller.
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
Hi, In that case I am removing the blocking request.
Flags: blocking1.7.12?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•19 years ago
|
||
maple's 7/28 release cycle has this error: U fullsoft/runtime/unix/Linux2_x86/talkback U fullsoft/runtime/unix/Linux2_x86/talkback.so cvs checkout: Updating fullsoft/runtime/unix/SunOS5_sparc Read from remote host cvs.mozilla.org: Connection timed out NEXT ERROR cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) Looks like the connection to the CVS server failed while it was pulling the Talkback module.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > mozilla/nightly/2005-07-28-07-1.7/linux-xpi > talkback.xpi 28-Jul-2005 16:57 1.1K > > mozilla/nightly/2005-07-29-11-1.7/linux-xpi > talkback.xpi 29-Jul-2005 21:42 781K > > but the parent directory holds nothing but linux-xpi: > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/nightly/2005-07-29-11-1.7/ I've forced the upload of the 7/29 release cycle to the nightly directory.
Comment 15•19 years ago
|
||
Hi, Chase could you reupload the 07-28 maple builds (with the correct talkback.xpi file) so we can install it ourselfs?
Comment 16•19 years ago
|
||
Hi, Chase could you reupload the 07-28 maple builds (with the correct talkback.xpi file) so we can install it ourselfs?
Comment 18•19 years ago
|
||
Hi, And when I used the stub installer I got an error -621. When it was installing to the Hard drive.
Comment 19•19 years ago
|
||
Hi, I have written https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302872 to try to fix this problem.
Comment 20•19 years ago
|
||
Hi, What we could do is update the linux builds to the 07-29 builds that have the correct talkback.xpi file.
Comment 22•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #20) > What we could do is update the linux builds to the 07-29 builds that have the > correct talkback.xpi file. Believe me, Chase knows what we can do, and he is working on a solution. What you could do to help is to test the builds Chase commented about in comment 14 and tell if they are working correctly, i.e. if all variants, including the installers, work correctly, and if talkback get installed and used in those.
Comment 23•19 years ago
|
||
Hi, Updated builds are now avaible. See http://mozilla.osuosl.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.7.11/
Comment 24•19 years ago
|
||
I think you should announce about linux build's update right now. Many localizers already working with existing no-talkback builds. Please never replace released builds without announce to localizers. Making fixed build is not problem but replacing without announce will lose localizer's motivation. So, Please.
Comment 25•19 years ago
|
||
A short description needed for release page. See http://www.mozilla.org/releases/#1.6b http://www.mozilla.org/releases/#1.6a "The original Linux builds were..." "New builds are available as of..."
(In reply to comment #25) > A short description needed for release page. But in this case the builds were replaced *before* it was released on the Web site.
Comment 27•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #26) > But in this case the builds were replaced *before* it was released on the Web site. But some users (and many localizers) have already downloaded these builds from FTP. Only a short description makes everyone happy :-)
Comment 28•19 years ago
|
||
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.7.11/linux-xpi/ talkback.xpi 29-Jul-2005 19:28 781K
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 29•19 years ago
|
||
For localizers, I (dynamis) posted to L10N NG about this. http://groups.google.co.jp/group/netscape.public.mozilla.l10n/browse_frm/thread/52c6cd026ab3ddb4/ca90b342343db361?tvc=1 If my message includes something wrong, correct it in the NG please. Thanks.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•