Closed
Bug 302937
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Expose "click" action on text and image leaves of element containing onclick
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: aaronlev, Assigned: aaronlev)
Details
(Keywords: access)
Attachments
(1 file)
For onclick we should parallel what we do for links, we expose the link actions on the leaf text and image content. This helps the screen reader handle the links and actionable items. In the future we may provide more actions via XML Events or some way of describing actions, and we will want to expose those actions on the actual leaf content as well.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #191207 -
Flags: review?(parente)
Comment on attachment 191207 [details] [diff] [review] 1) Have nsLinkableAccessible handle onclicks (probably should rename to nsActionableAccessible or something but that would bloat patch) , 2) Initialize action immediately Should nsAccessible::getNumActions return NS_OK?
Attachment #191207 -
Flags: review?(parente) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 191207 [details] [diff] [review] 1) Have nsLinkableAccessible handle onclicks (probably should rename to nsActionableAccessible or something but that would bloat patch) , 2) Initialize action immediately Yeah lets have it return 0 and NS_OK for nsAccessible::getNumActions
Attachment #191207 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #191207 -
Flags: superreview?(roc) → superreview?(jst)
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 191207 [details] [diff] [review] 1) Have nsLinkableAccessible handle onclicks (probably should rename to nsActionableAccessible or something but that would bloat patch) , 2) Initialize action immediately sr=jst
Attachment #191207 -
Flags: superreview?(jst) → superreview+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #191207 -
Flags: approval1.8b4?
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #191207 -
Flags: approval1.8b4? → approval1.8b4+
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
if (!mIsLink) // Also initializes private data members That comment seems wrong now...
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Looks like this was checked in ages ago and I forgot to mark it fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•