User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050610 Firefox/1.0.4 (Debian package 1.0.4-3) Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050610 Firefox/1.0.4 (Debian package 1.0.4-3) According to rfc 2616 section 14.14 Content-Location, "The value of Content-Location also defines the base URI for the entity." However, in the above page, this Content-Location in response is not taken into account. If it were to be taken into account, the example url would simply not work (The content location provided in http header points to an inexistant domain) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: See details Actual Results: Relative ressources (like pictures) were loaded as relative to typed url in address bar, not relative to Content-Location information in headers Expected Results: Attemps of browser to load ressources relative to Content-Location (aka consider Content-Location as Base URL) The provided example URL has been tested with konqueror and amaya, they both have the excpected RFC conformance result (aka provided badly configured example website does not work)
The spec also says "The Content-Location value is not a replacement for the original requested URI" *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 109553 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.