Closed
Bug 305261
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Automatic update says it finds an update to Deer Park 1.0+ when it's really 1.6a1 / 1.4
Categories
(Toolkit :: Application Update, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: mossop, Assigned: morgamic)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
5.83 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
The trunk firefox is on version 1.6a1. Running check for updates says it finds an update to "Deer Park 1.0+". Downloading and installing and the version is actually 1.6a1.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
This appears to be fixed now.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Wasn't cc'd on this so I didn't know it existed. This was/is an artifact of how the update info is currently sent from the build systems. If we get time we'll address it sooner rather than later. Until we address it, version bumps need to be accompanied by similar changes to the build systems.
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050918 Firefox/1.4 ID:2005091812 the update window tell me there's an update for 1.0+
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Summary: Automatic update says it finds an update to Deer Park 1.0+ when it's really 1.6a1 → Automatic update says it finds an update to Deer Park 1.0+ when it's really 1.6a1 / 1.4
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050918 > Firefox/1.4 ID:2005091812 > > the update window tell me there's an update for 1.0+ Still working out why, but it appears that if you update in the first 15-30 minutes after a complete update has been made available, you get a message that 1.0+ is what you're updating to. Everything works properly after the partial patch is written. Will investigate.
Assignee: nobody → chase
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4) > Still working out why, but it appears that if you update in the first 15-30 > minutes after a complete update has been made available, you get a message that > 1.0+ is what you're updating to. Everything works properly after the partial > patch is written. Will investigate. Yep, it's fine now Chase Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20050921 Firefox/1.4 ID:2005092107 resolving
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
duh... I thing i found the issue now: If I update from a nightly build , say 2005092207 to the 2005092308 nightly build, everything works fine and the update is reported as 1.4 If I update from an hourly build, say 2005092209 to the 2005092308 nightly build, Murphy kicks in, the update is reported as 1.0+ and it mdared to tell me it was going to disable a fully compatible extension (Consol²). (screenshot follows) Given the fact that non-testers do download hourly builds, just to get a "release build" before anyone else (thanks to pre announcements on e.g. /. and others) this should be fixed before 1.5 final. (better avoid than deal with 10.000 dupe crap bugs later)
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Flags: blocking1.8b5?
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20050923 Firefox/1.4 ID:2005092307
Updated•19 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.8b5? → blocking1.8b5-
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
Peter - just to verify, it didn't disable the extension though it said it would... true?
Comment 9•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8) > Peter - just to verify, it didn't disable the extension though it said it > would... true? Lemme try that Robert (but let's back up my profile first)
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9) > > Peter - just to verify, it didn't disable the extension though it said it > > would... true? Nope, the extension(s) work fine, it's just the confusing message (and ugly looking warning).
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
To confirm: I had the exact same behaviour that Peter had (almost the same picture as in the attachment), BUT updating nightly -> nightly. (now Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20050925 Firefox/1.4 - Build ID: 2005092506) Supposedly 2 extensions incompatible (Console² and Classic Menus) and to be disabled, but still alive and well after the update (i.e. NOT disabled).
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
URL using a nightly build - everything is correct https://aus2.mozilla.org/update/1/Firefox/1.4/2005092205/Linux_x86-gcc3/en-US/nightly/update.xml URL with the last digit in the build id decremented https://aus2.mozilla.org/update/1/Firefox/1.4/2005092204/Linux_x86-gcc3/en-US/nightly/update.xml Notice that version="1.0+" extensionVersion="1.0+"
| Reporter | ||
Comment 13•19 years ago
|
||
This could be related some oddity I came across the other day with incremental updating. I don't recall the specifics but it came down to a problem when the build starts shortly before the end of an hour. The build id is generated fairly early in the process, but the upload to the server happens in the next hour, so a build in the server dir 2005-09-26-07 might actually contain build 2005092606.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.9a1?
Comment 14•19 years ago
|
||
I'm not *entirely* sure this is the same but... This happened to me today with Thunderbird. I got notice about Thunderbird 1.0+ instead of Thunderbird 1.4 when I wanted to update from 20050928 to 29 branch. It re-downloaded the whole thing (no incr.) but Thunderbird was not updated. Did it twice but still the 20050928 version stayed. Linux btw.
Comment 16•19 years ago
|
||
So this seems like a case of AUS not recognizing the build ID and then spitting out the same <update type="minor" version="1.0+" extensionVersion="1.0+"> all the time, even though the rest is correct (branch/trunk, latest build, full download).
| Assignee | ||
Comment 17•19 years ago
|
||
Examining and testing AUS2 behavior when partial/complete patch data exists without the other. The solution is most likely not offering a partial update when a complete update doesn't exist. Will have to delve into things a bit deeper to find out why things get skewed when a complete exists on its own. The 1.0+ issue comes form AUS2 defaults that get chosen when the complete patch data doesn't exist. This will be resolved once the presence of a complete patch is a prerequisite for offering an update. Thanks for all the great feedback - nice catch everyone.
Assignee: chase → morgamic
Status: REOPENED → NEW
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 18•19 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce this bug anymore. Starting immediately after the Firefox 20051107 branch nightly was produced, I pulled update.xml [1] with wget every 30 seconds. The content of the file went from <updates></updates>, to one with partial & complete patches and a version of 1.5. Whatever change caused bug 314189 might be related, if it disabled complete patches in the absence of a partial one. [1] https://aus2.mozilla.org/update/1/Firefox/1.5/2005110503/WINNT_x86-msvc/en-US/nightly/update.xml
Comment 20•19 years ago
|
||
Trunk is now at 3.0a1 and there aren't problems with updates being mislabeled.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Updated•18 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.9a1?
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Firefox → Toolkit
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•