Closed Bug 305356 Opened 19 years ago Closed 19 years ago

Tp (pageload) performance regression between 26-July-2005 07:00 and 09:00

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: j.moz, Assigned: dougt)

Details

(4 keywords)

Pageload times for pacifica, beast and creature all increased in July 26:
http://build-graphs.mozilla.org/graph/multiquery.cgi?tboxes=pacifica%2Cbeast%2Ccreature&testname=pageload&points=&autoscale=1&units=&ltype=&avg=1&days=40

Looking at tinderbox I think the regression window is around 2005-07-26 07:50
and 08:50: 
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Firefox&hours=1&maxdate=1122392800&legend=0

Here are the checkins between 07:50 and 08:50:  
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2005-07-26+07%3A50&maxdate=2005-07-26+08%3A50&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot

Bug 268798 and possibly bug 297131 look suspicious.

Bug 299231, bug 275960 and bug 293388 were checked in after 08:40, and I think
beast regressed before that.
First trying bug 268798, which might have caused this Tp regression. Cc'ing
people from that bug.
Boris, can you look at this Tp regression please?
My guess would be bug 293388.
(In reply to comment #2)
> Boris, can you look at this Tp regression please?
> My guess would be bug 293388.

Mats, read https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268798#c11
Bug 268798 was the only checkin for beast for that build and that's when Tp +
started

Ok, I don't know to what degree one can trust the local clocks on these machines
though, are all machines within mozilla.org running NTP?
My impression from using Bugzilla/Bonsai/Tinderbox/CVS is that clocks can be
out-of-sync by several minutes.
You can always look at the checkin log to see what they pulled.
The build log, I mean.
I suggest that someone (me maybe) back out each checkin locally on the tbox to
identify exactly which check cause this (or if any did).
Given that this increase only happened on Windows tinderboxes, I'd say that
local backout (as a test) of bug 268798 is indeed the place to start.
Doug T, do you have time to test if local backout of bug 268798 fixes this
10-13% Tp regression? Thanks
Flags: blocking1.8b4?
Keywords: pp
Assignee: nobody → dougt
Flags: blocking1.8b4? → blocking1.8b4+
Looks like that backout helps.  r+sr=bzbarsky on the backout.
a=asa
Backed out from 1.8:
Checking in modules/libpr0n/src/imgCache.cpp;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/src/imgCache.cpp,v  <--  imgCache.cpp
new revision: 1.18.2.1; previous revision: 1.18
done

Backed out from trunk:
Checking in modules/libpr0n/src/imgCache.cpp;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/src/imgCache.cpp,v  <--  imgCache.cpp
new revision: 1.19; previous revision: 1.18
done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Component: General → ImageLib
Product: Firefox → Core
Version: unspecified → Trunk
verified Tp inprovement on branch (Pacifica)
-> fixed1.8
Keywords: fixed1.8
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.