Closed
Bug 305993
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
The requestee field may be omitted even when a requestee is already set
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Attachments & Requests, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 3.6
People
(Reporter: LpSolit, Assigned: LpSolit)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
2.44 KB,
patch
|
LpSolit
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Flag.pm says:
# Make sure the user didn't specify a requestee unless the flag
# is specifically requestable. If the requestee was set before
# the flag became specifically unrequestable, leave it as is.
But template/en/default/flag/list.html.tmpl displays the requestee field only when:
[% IF any_flags_requesteeble %]
<td>
[% IF type.is_active && type.is_requesteeble %]
That means that if a requestee was initially set and now the flag is no longer
specifically requestable, the requestee field will not be displayed anymore
despite a requestee is given.
Not only the requestee is not visible anymore, but the next time the bug or the
attachment is edited, the requestee will be (silently) removed, which is not wanted!| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.20
Updated•19 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [Good Intro Bug]
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
If someone edits a flag to make it no longer specifically requestable, it ought to remove all the requestees (and warn the admin doing it that it's going to do so first).
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Probably not that easy to fix, so removing [Good Intro Bug].
Whiteboard: [Good Intro Bug]
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.20 → Bugzilla 2.22
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
We are freezing the code for 3.0 in two weeks and we don't expect this bug to be fixed on time.
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.22 → ---
lpsolit? my bug is about disabled, not !specifically_requestable. justdave's comment seems to imply that you're talking about a bug that lost its specifically_requestable bit. we explicitly want to be able to have requested flags that are pending but for which no new pending flags may be added.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
This patch depends on code which landed in bug 415541, so we cannot take it for 3.4. So r+'ing myself as module owner for flags.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Severity: normal → minor
Flags: approval+
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 3.6
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Checking in attachment.cgi; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/attachment.cgi,v <-- attachment.cgi new revision: 1.158; previous revision: 1.157 done Checking in Bugzilla/Bug.pm; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm,v <-- Bug.pm new revision: 1.288; previous revision: 1.287 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•