Closed
Bug 307150
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Incomplete implementation of javax.mail.Message in grendel.storage.MessageReadOnly
Categories
(Grendel Graveyard :: Protocols, defect, P1)
Grendel Graveyard
Protocols
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: kieran.maclean, Assigned: kieran.maclean)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
|
23.69 KB,
patch
|
rjkeller
:
review-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
23.42 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
|
46.85 KB,
patch
|
rjkeller
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050717 Firefox/1.0.6 Build Identifier: The implementation of javax.mail.Message in grendel.storage.MessageReadOnly is incomplete it lacks functionality that is required for the use of it as JavaMail Message. The methods: public Enumeration getAllHeaders(); public Message reply(boolean replyToAll); are the most important as the first is used to render the message, and the second to reply to a message both operations are needed by Grendel users. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: rlkeller → kieran
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
This patch completes the implementation of grendel.storage.MessageReadOnly. It also fixes a bug with the detection of the content type of a message.
Attachment #195083 -
Flags: review?(kieran)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 195083 [details] [diff] [review] Patch to complete the implementation Wrong reveiwer, sorry
Attachment #195083 -
Flags: review?(kieran) → review?(rlkeller)
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 195083 [details] [diff] [review] Patch to complete the implementation > references = internReferences(id_table, value.trim()); > } > } > + base_headers = h; > } bad indentation > + String type = "text/plain"; //XXX lie to it... > + String[] content_types = getHeader("Content-Type"); > + if ((content_types!=null)&&(content_types.length>0)) { > + type = content_types[0]; > + } > + data_handler = new DataHandler(getContentAsString(),type); > + } > + return data_handler; You have an uncessary level of indentation here. > protected InternetHeaders getHeadersObj() throws MessagingException { > + if (full_headers==null) { > + try { > InputStream is=getInputStreamWithHeaders(); > - InternetHeaders ih=new InternetHeaders(is); > + full_headers=new InternetHeaders(is); > try { is.close(); } catch(Exception e) {e.printStackTrace();} > - return ih; > + } catch (IOException ioe) { > + if (session.getDebug()) { > + ioe.printStackTrace(); > + } inconsistent indentation > + public abstract InputStream getInputStreamWithHeaders() throws MessagingException, IOException; /*{ > + Kieran, just delete the code please :). This is so confusing for people reading the code. > + if (! urlName.getHost().equalsIgnoreCase(url.getHost())) throw new MessagingException("Not the same host."); > + if (urlName.getPort() != url.getPort()) throw new MessagingException("Not the same port."); > + String file = urlName.getFile(); > + if (file.contains("/")) throw new MessagingException("Invalid URL."); This is a bit hard to read. Move the "throw" statements to the next line.
Attachment #195083 -
Flags: review?(rlkeller) → review-
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
This patch completes the implementation of grendel.storage.MessageReadOnly, with the source formatting corrected. It also fixes a bug with the detection of the content type of a message. Some sections of the code look incorrectly formatted, however the indentation is correct in the source file but the diff ignores whitespace so it puts the old indentation in the diff.
Attachment #195118 -
Flags: review?(rlkeller)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
This patch completes the implementation of grendel.storage.MessageReadOnly, with the source formatting corrected. This patch also has serveral whitespace changes included in it as well. It also fixes a bug with the detection of the content type of a message.
Attachment #195136 -
Flags: review?(rlkeller)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
Arranging bug dependences and assignments for code patches.
No longer blocks: 304954
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 195136 [details] [diff] [review] Patch to complete the implementation (+ws changes) looks good! r=rj.keller@beonex.com. Sorry for the delay.
Attachment #195136 -
Flags: review?(rlkeller) → review+
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #195118 -
Flags: review?(rlkeller)
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
Fix checked in.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•