Closed
Bug 310008
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Punycode in "could not be found" error
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Navigation, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: jsgoupil, Assigned: adamlock)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7 Type in address bar http://www.google.com¾ or http://www.google.com¸ It will give you the following ` 1) www.google.xn--com34-g33b could not be found 2) www.google.xn--com -e1c could not be found Reproducible: Always
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Two hours of reading IDN bugs, and I'm not sure whether or not this has been discussed. Gerv? Do we intentionally want to display punycode in errors for non-whitelisted tlds, either for security or for consistency with what the addressbar is showing? (It's filed on dialogs, I'd guess, in 1.0.x, but we do also show punycode on trunk.)
Assignee: nobody → adamlock
Component: General → Embedding: Docshell
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → adamlock
Summary: bad url in "could not be found" (address bar) → Punycode in "could not be found" error
Version: unspecified → Trunk
What are your settings for network.enableIDN and network.IDN_show_punycode? Note Bug 283586. With network.enableIDN = true & network.IDN_show_punycode = false then it shows the error in IDN for me with Mozilla 1.7.12. But the default values are true for both prefs, then it shows of course in Punycode.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
In about:config (I had to search to find that line) network.enableIDN = true network.IDN_show_punycode = true Even if it is normal to show these "punycode", I don't think it is a good thing to show it by default.
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
Firefox 1.0.x shows punycode always, but Firefox 1.5 will not. I'm not particularly concerned what this error says, although the ideal would be IDN for whitelisted TLDs and punycode for others. Gerv
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
Okay, invalid per comment 4 then: 1.0.x shows punycode always, because that was the best we could do back then, 1.5 shows punycode for non-whitelisted top level domains and not for whitelisted ones, in both the urlbar and in the body of (the default) XUL error pages, and there's already a bug on the one combination of prefs where we could possibly be wrong.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•