Closed
Bug 310089
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
{inc}incremental reflow intrinsic width of max-width block inside table is too wide
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Block and Inline, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: nmaier, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [reflow-refactor])
Attachments
(1 file)
3.41 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20050924 Firefox/1.4 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20050924 Firefox/1.4 No reflow done for max-width'ed elements inside table-cells. Seems the newly restricted (computed) width is not considered correctly. Assignment of maxWidth via js always fails. While max-width in style fails only on first load (non-cached) and only on particular document structures. Seems to have to do with loading/rendering stages and or timeing? But Im not familar with Gecko or moz source hacking. Not sure if this is tables only. Or if eg. floats are affected as well. (not tested further). Attaching a testcase. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
And spamming some more :p Just saw that loading this via file:// doesnt affect the first max-width table. And the bugzilla version does not either. Seems to be a timeing related issue, since I saw it displayed incorrectly when using a somewhat slow server. Having nglayout.initialpaint.delay = 0
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
Dupe of bug 307866 / bug 308403?
Assignee: dbaron → nobody
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Style System (CSS) → Layout: Block and Inline
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: ian → layout.block-and-inline
Summary: bad CSS max-width / maxWidth reflow (inside tables) → {inc}incremental reflow intrinsic width of max-width block inside table is too wide
No, those are about 'max-width' on table cells, not on blocks inside table cells.
Updated•18 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [reflow-refactor]
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20061208 Minefield/3.0a1 ID:2006120812 [cairo] Seems fixed by reflow branch landing
Updated•18 years ago
|
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Adding in-testsuite? nomination per bz's request in m.d.t.l. Sorry for the bugspam.
Flags: in-testsuite?
Updated•12 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•