310131 - svg graphic can not be showed

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Core :: SVG, defect)

Description

[julia]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050908 Firefox/1.4
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050908 Firefox/1.4

When I click "view demo" link at http:http://www.adobe.com/svg/examples.html
,the svg graphic on the opened page can not be diplay properly, but IE 6.0 with
adobe svg viewer can. And I find a svg example code at w3c's website
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-SVG-20000802/animate.html#AnimationElementsExample
19.2.3 Animation elements example),save the code in html file, IE 6.0 with adobe
svg viewer can display the animation but firefox can't :(  

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.open "http://www.adobe.com/svg/examples.html"
2.click either "view demo" link


Actual Results:  
error reported :XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://www.adobe.com/svg/demos/chart.svgz
Line Number 1, Column 1:

Expected Results:  
a graphic

Comment 1

[julia]

In 1.5 release notes
(http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/releases/1.5beta1.html), it's said that
"# New support for Web Standards including SVG, CSS 2 and CSS 3, and JavaScript
1.6.".that's why i wanna try firefox 1.5, but fact is not. i was disappointed,
and wish u can fix it at soon as possiable, thx!

Comment 2

[PikeUK]

Both those testcases look broken, e.g. screwed up encoding on the Adobe one, no
namespace on the W3C one. Not certain though so moving bug to correct component.

->Core:SVG

Comment 3

[Jonathan Watt [:jwatt]]

> error reported :XML Parsing Error: not well-formed

This means there is an error in the document, not an error in Firefox. The SVG
on Adobe's site is invalid and quite broken. See

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/message/51710

and for how these things could be fixed:

  http://jwatt.org/svg/authoring/

Note that we don't support animation of SVG yet. That will come with Firefox 2.0
hopefully. Also the SVG you link to on the W3C site is also not a valid example.
That file is part of a pre-SVG 1.0 candidate recommendation. See the "CR" in the
URL. As such it *may* be invalid according to the final SVG 1.0 spec. Please use
examples that are coded to SVG 1.0 or SVG 1.1 only.