Closed
Bug 313256
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Update CSS for attachment comment in real time to private comments
Categories
(Bugzilla :: User Interface, enhancement)
Bugzilla
User Interface
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 3.0
People
(Reporter: batosti, Assigned: batosti)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.28 KB,
patch
|
goobix
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050725 Firefox/1.0.6 (Ubuntu package 1.0.6) Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050725 Firefox/1.0.6 (Ubuntu package 1.0.6) The bz_private style is used to display private comments. If the status is changed for the attachment the style of comment textbox will be changed in real time. Reproducible: Always
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: myk → batosti
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.22
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #200635 -
Flags: review?(bugreport)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Summary: update css for attachment comment in real time to private comments → Update CSS for attachment comment in real time to private comments
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 200635 [details] [diff] [review] batosti_v1 - <textarea wrap="soft" id="commment" name="comment" rows="6" cols="80"></textarea> + <textarea wrap="soft" id="comment" name="comment" rows="6" cols="80"></textarea> This was moved in bug 329323, and it's only for 2.20 and 2.22 (trunk has it fixed). In addition, including this here makes your patch bitrotten on trunk (applying it fails). Also, this specific change should be commited in 2.20 as well (the target of this bug is 2.20). So please make a patch that reflects only the bug summary. Also, what's up with this - document.refresh(); thing?
Attachment #200635 -
Flags: review?(bugreport) → review-
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
I meant 'the target of this bug is NOT 2.20' in my previous comment.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #200635 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #214177 -
Flags: review?(vladd)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.22 → Bugzilla 2.24
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 214177 [details] [diff] [review] batosti_v1_fix This works if we're going to support only DOM level 1 compliant browsers. Upon checkin, document.getElementById *could* be replaced with a larger function, in order to add support for a wide range of browsers. This is completely optional. One possible version could be: function returnObjById( id ) { if (document.getElementById) var returnVar = document.getElementById(id); else if (document.all) var returnVar = document.all[id]; else if (document.layers) var returnVar = document.layers[id]; return returnVar; } Google.com used to use: function el(id) { if (document.getElementById) { return document.getElementById(id); } else if (window[id]) { return window[id]; } return null; } The one who sets the approval? flag could specify its preference for one of those 3 versions.
Attachment #214177 -
Flags: review?(vladd) → review+
Updated•18 years ago
|
Flags: approval?
Updated•18 years ago
|
Flags: approval? → approval+
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Checking in template/en/default/attachment/create.html.tmpl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/attachment/create.html.tmpl,v <-- create.html.tmpl new revision: 1.26; previous revision: 1.25 done
Severity: normal → enhancement
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•