313912 - Talkback missing from Seamonkey Linux & Windows

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(Webtools Graveyard :: Tinderbox, defect)

Description

[Hermann Schwab]

Only dummies are found in the linux-xpi and windows-xpi folders of current Seamonkey nightlies. 

Last builds including Talkback:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2005-10-13-06-trunk/
linux-xpi  : talkback.xpi     13-Oct-2005 16:06  781K
windows-xpi: talkback.xpi     13-Oct-2005 15:29  256K

current builds without:

http://mozilla.osuosl.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2005-10-26-06-trunk/linux-xpi/
talkback.xpi     26-Oct-2005 13:56  1.1K

http://mozilla.osuosl.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2005-10-25-10-trunk/windows-xpi/
talkback.xpi     25-Oct-2005 18:00  3.3K

Comment 1

[Ian Neal]

*** Bug 314032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

I think the talkback build is working again on both Linux and Windows. Witness:

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2005-10-27-17-trunk/linux-xpi/
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2005-10-27-18-trunk/windows-xpi/

(I'm looking at the file size of talkback.xpi specifically)

On Linux, there were ssh version issues between the build machine and the cvs server so the initial checkout was dying silently. Using version 2 of the protocol fixed this.

On Windows, ActiveState perl was munging the path of make-makefile at the start of the talkback build. I switched back to cygwin perl (after updating cygwin) and talkback now builds fine.

Comment 3

[Hermann Schwab]

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051027 SeaMonkey/1.1a
BuildID 2005102717, Talkback working :-(
TB11167392X, TB11167383W for bug 313212

Comment 4

[Robert Kaiser]

coop, comet isn't reporting its perf numbers since the changes you did (and it's not labeled with "release" any more, but I think that's not too important, right?)

Comment 5

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

(In reply to comment #4)
> coop, comet isn't reporting its perf numbers since the changes you did (and
> it's not labeled with "release" any more, but I think that's not too important,
> right?)

Oops! Both are pretty simple fixes; next cycle should be as before.

Comment 6

[Robert Kaiser]

looks good now, thanks!

Comment 7

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

Yep.  Fixed in a tar.gz build too.  Thanks, Chris!