The default bug view has changed. See this FAQ.

Release Notes For Bugzilla 2.16.11

RESOLVED FIXED in Bugzilla 2.16

Status

()

Bugzilla
Documentation
--
blocker
RESOLVED FIXED
11 years ago
11 years ago

People

(Reporter: Max Kanat-Alexander, Assigned: Max Kanat-Alexander)

Tracking

2.16.9
Bugzilla 2.16

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment, 2 obsolete attachments)

(Assignee)

Description

11 years ago
We'll just need to note that some security bugs were fixed, and give people a URL to the advisory.
(Assignee)

Comment 1

11 years ago
Created attachment 207530 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
Assignee: documentation → mkanat
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #207530 - Flags: review?(documentation)

Comment 2

11 years ago
Comment on attachment 207530 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

>+**********************************************************
>+*** USERS UPGRADING FROM ALL VERSIONS PRIOR TO 2.16.10 ***
>+**********************************************************
>+
>+ This is only a security fix release, for a local privilege
>+ escalation issue. You can see the details of this security
>+ fix at:
>+
>+ http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.16.10-nr/
>+
>+**********************************************************
>+*** USERS UPGRADING FROM ALL VERSIONS PRIOR TO 2.16.10 ***
>+**********************************************************
>+
>+ The 2.16.10 release repairs a critical bug in 2.16.9 where
>+ no user could enter a bug, under many circumstances.
>+

Are these both meant to be the same heading?
Attachment #207530 - Flags: review?(documentation) → review-
(Assignee)

Comment 3

11 years ago
Created attachment 207534 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

Good catch. :-)
Attachment #207530 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #207534 - Flags: review?(documentation)

Comment 4

11 years ago
Comment on attachment 207534 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

>Index: docs/rel_notes.txt
>-The 2.16.10 release repairs a critical bug in
>-2.16.9 where no user could enter a bug, under many circumstances.

Would it not be best to have a short one-liner about 2.16.11 as well?
Attachment #207534 - Flags: review?(documentation) → review-
(Assignee)

Comment 5

11 years ago
Created attachment 207539 [details] [diff] [review]
v3

Okay, good idea. Here we go.
Attachment #207534 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #207539 - Flags: review?(documentation)

Comment 6

11 years ago
Comment on attachment 207539 [details] [diff] [review]
v3

Better, looks OK to me now.
Attachment #207539 - Flags: review?(documentation) → review+
(Assignee)

Comment 7

11 years ago
Checking in docs/rel_notes.txt;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/rel_notes.txt,v  <--  rel_notes.txt
new revision: 1.10.2.25; previous revision: 1.10.2.24
done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.