Last Comment Bug 320313 - Release Notes For Bugzilla 2.16.11
: Release Notes For Bugzilla 2.16.11
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
:
Product: Bugzilla
Classification: Server Software
Component: Documentation (show other bugs)
: 2.16.9
: All All
: -- blocker (vote)
: Bugzilla 2.16
Assigned To: Max Kanat-Alexander
: default-qa
Mentors:
Depends on:
Blocks: 320306
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-12-14 17:08 PST by Max Kanat-Alexander
Modified: 2006-01-04 12:09 PST (History)
0 users
See Also:
QA Whiteboard:
Iteration: ---
Points: ---


Attachments
v1 (1.41 KB, patch)
2006-01-04 11:37 PST, Max Kanat-Alexander
mozilla+bmo: review-
Details | Diff | Review
v2 (1.41 KB, patch)
2006-01-04 11:42 PST, Max Kanat-Alexander
mozilla+bmo: review-
Details | Diff | Review
v3 (1.67 KB, patch)
2006-01-04 12:03 PST, Max Kanat-Alexander
mozilla+bmo: review+
Details | Diff | Review

Description Max Kanat-Alexander 2005-12-14 17:08:45 PST
We'll just need to note that some security bugs were fixed, and give people a URL to the advisory.
Comment 1 Max Kanat-Alexander 2006-01-04 11:37:18 PST
Created attachment 207530 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
Comment 2 Colin Ogilvie [:cso] 2006-01-04 11:41:24 PST
Comment on attachment 207530 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

>+**********************************************************
>+*** USERS UPGRADING FROM ALL VERSIONS PRIOR TO 2.16.10 ***
>+**********************************************************
>+
>+ This is only a security fix release, for a local privilege
>+ escalation issue. You can see the details of this security
>+ fix at:
>+
>+ http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.16.10-nr/
>+
>+**********************************************************
>+*** USERS UPGRADING FROM ALL VERSIONS PRIOR TO 2.16.10 ***
>+**********************************************************
>+
>+ The 2.16.10 release repairs a critical bug in 2.16.9 where
>+ no user could enter a bug, under many circumstances.
>+

Are these both meant to be the same heading?
Comment 3 Max Kanat-Alexander 2006-01-04 11:42:38 PST
Created attachment 207534 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

Good catch. :-)
Comment 4 Colin Ogilvie [:cso] 2006-01-04 11:51:40 PST
Comment on attachment 207534 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

>Index: docs/rel_notes.txt
>-The 2.16.10 release repairs a critical bug in
>-2.16.9 where no user could enter a bug, under many circumstances.

Would it not be best to have a short one-liner about 2.16.11 as well?
Comment 5 Max Kanat-Alexander 2006-01-04 12:03:04 PST
Created attachment 207539 [details] [diff] [review]
v3

Okay, good idea. Here we go.
Comment 6 Colin Ogilvie [:cso] 2006-01-04 12:05:30 PST
Comment on attachment 207539 [details] [diff] [review]
v3

Better, looks OK to me now.
Comment 7 Max Kanat-Alexander 2006-01-04 12:09:20 PST
Checking in docs/rel_notes.txt;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/rel_notes.txt,v  <--  rel_notes.txt
new revision: 1.10.2.25; previous revision: 1.10.2.24
done

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.