325681 - [Mac] Disabled, checked checkbox does not appear checked

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Core Graveyard :: Widget: Mac, defect)

Description

[Jesse Ruderman]

Steps to reproduce:
1. Load data:text/html,Foopy: <input type=checkbox checked disabled>

Result: The checkbox doesn't appear checked.  If you're very perceptive, you might notice that the check does appear, but in the wrong place: at the top left of the content area.

Regression window:

2006 Jan 25 evening: fine
2006 Jan 26 evening: has the bug
2006 Feb  2 evening: has the bug

Based on the regression date, guessing that this regressed due to frame display lists.

Comment 1

[Jesse Ruderman]

I noticed this because Bugzilla shows a disabled, checked checkbox if you view a bug that is restricted to a group, but you're not part of the group (e.g. you're the reporter).

Comment 2

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

So this seems to not be a problem on Linux, which suggests native theme issues to me.  In particular, the coordinate system for painting changed; was native theme code not fixed to deal?

Is this a problem on WinXP too?

Comment 3

[Jesse Ruderman]

Not a problem on Windows XP.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060131 Firefox/1.6a1

Comment 4

[Simon Fraser [no longer active]]

Probably an nsNativeTheme thing.

Comment 5

[Asaf Romano (gone)]

(In reply to comment #4)
> Probably an nsNativeTheme thing.
> 

Jesse says this is a regression for html content, which isn't drawn by nsNativeThemeMac at all (in anything but Camino).

Comment 6

[Smokey Ardisson (offline for a while; not following bugs - do not email)]

Is this bug 325296, too (or the issue that bug 325296 is left open to track)?

Comment 7

[David Baron :dbaron: (⌚️UTC-4, no longer working on Mozilla)]

Could it be a bug in the non-native-theme codepath that's covered up whenever native theme is used?

Comment 8

[Smokey Ardisson (offline for a while; not following bugs - do not email)]

This WFM in GPA3 and my latest Camino trunk build.

Comment 9

[Mike Connor [:mconnor]]

punting remaining a6 bugs to b1, all of these shipped in a5, so we're at least no worse off by doing so.

Comment 10

[Håkan Waara]

WFM on 2007081600 OS X 10.4.10.  

Does it really make sense to keep it blocking1.9+ even if it's carbon-only (AFAICS)?

Comment 11

[Jesse Ruderman]

WFM on trunk.