Closed
Bug 327833
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
In <inspector.xul>, "Failed to load overlay from chrome://browser/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul"
Categories
(Other Applications :: DOM Inspector, defect)
Other Applications
DOM Inspector
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jfm, Assigned: sdwilsh)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
3.36 KB,
patch
|
timeless
:
review+
neil
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/417.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.8 Build Identifier: seamonkey-1.0 built_from_src When opening Tools/Web/DOM Inspector : Warning: Failed to load overlay from chrome://browser/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul. Source File: chrome://inspector/content/inspector.xul Line: 0 Indeed: /sw/bld/seamonkey-1.0-1/mozilla# grep -rI baseMenuOverlay * find . -name 'baseMenuOverlay.*' extensions/inspector/resources/content/inspector.xul:<?xul-overlay href="chrome://browser/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul"?> /sw/bld/seamonkey-1.0-1/mozilla# find . -name 'baseMenuOverlay.*' /sw/bld/seamonkey-1.0-1/mozilla# Contrasting with: http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla1.8.0/search?string=baseMenuOverlay : /browser/base/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul, line 43 -- <!ENTITY % baseMenuOverlayDTD SYSTEM "chrome://browser/locale/baseMenuOverlay.dtd"> /browser/base/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul, line 44 -- %baseMenuOverlayDTD; /browser/base/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul, line 46 -- <overlay id="baseMenuOverlay" /browser/base/content/browser-sets.inc, line 339 -- # Used by baseMenuOverlay /browser/base/content/browser.xul, line 50 -- <?xul-overlay href="chrome://browser/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul"?> /browser/base/content/macBrowserOverlay.xul, line 51 -- <?xul-overlay href="chrome://browser/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul"?> /browser/base/content/viewSourceOverlay.xul, line 42 -- <?xul-overlay href="chrome://browser/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul"?> /browser/components/bookmarks/content/bookmarksManager.xul, line 47 -- <?xul-overlay href="chrome://browser/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul"?> /browser/locales/jar.mn, line 8 -- locale/browser/baseMenuOverlay.dtd (%chrome/browser/baseMenuOverlay.dtd) This is with seamonkey-1.0 straight from mozilla's site: /sw/bld/seamonkey-1.0-1/mozilla# md5sum /sw/src/seamonkey-1.0.source.tar.bz2 e4f2edc5b2248d090303c70f5b28f210 /sw/src/seamonkey-1.0.source.tar.bz2 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Build probably irrelevant, if not : 2.ConfigureParams: --enable-xft --disable-freetype2 --enable-calendar --enable-optimize="-O3 -fstrict-aliasing" --disable-debug --enable-application=suite --enable-macos-target=10.4 --enable-prebinding --enable-default-toolkit=gtk2 --with-pthreads --with-default-mozilla-five-home=%p/lib/%N --mandir=%p/share/man --enable-strip --enable-extensions=all --enable-image-decoders=all --enable-ldap-experimental --enable-xpctools --enable-necko-protocols=all --enable-efence --enable-native-uconv --enable-ctl --enable-xinerama --with-system-mng --with-system-jpeg --with-system-png --with-system-zlib --enable-postscript --enable-ipv6 --enable-tests --with-x --enable-canvas --with-qtdir=%p --enable-pango --enable-svg --enable-update-packaging --enable-storage --enable-system-cairo --enable-profilesharing 3.For identical setup, grab my .info and .patch files from my experimental dir: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/jfmertens/crypto/finkinfo/ and 'fink install seamonkey' Actual Results: cf supra Expected Results: -
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Bug 295711 added that firefox-overlay in inspector.xul. SeaMonkey doesn't have it - that's why you see the error msg. This is known (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295711#c23), but was never filed.
Updated•18 years ago
|
OS: MacOS X → All
Hardware: Macintosh → All
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: benjamin → nobody
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061011 SeaMonkey/1.1b] (nightly) (W98SE) Bug still there.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Having Alex test this before I request for review. This also gets rid of the navigator errors that occur in Firefox. This /shouldn't/ break anything else, but the more people to test this, the merrier (I only build browser).
Assignee: nobody → comrade693+bmo
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
Silly me, Seamonkey doesn't support chrome.manifest, so I can only fix the issue that this bug reported. This doesn't seem to break browser.
Attachment #245873 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #245876 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #245876 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #245876 -
Flags: superreview?(neil) → superreview+
Attachment #245876 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [checkin needed]
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
v1.1 checked in by smaug. Reporter/one of you who confirmed this, can you verify in the next build please?
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [checkin needed]
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Syntax is wrong for the overlay - causing problems (I'm unsure how these problems aren't showing up on my build). New patch shortly.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20061121 Minefield/3.0a1 ID:2006112121 [cairo] this has caused Firefox not to startup anymore.
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7) > this has caused Firefox not to startup anymore. It should work with a new profile, right? I think it only affects profiles that were used when the broken patch was checked in.
Comment 9•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > this has caused Firefox not to startup anymore. > > It should work with a new profile, right? apparently not, same problem with clean new profile
Comment 10•18 years ago
|
||
see: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2613393#2613393
Comment 11•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > this has caused Firefox not to startup anymore. > > > > It should work with a new profile, right? > > apparently not, same problem with clean new profile > The startup problem when DOMi is enabled seems to have gone away with a clobber. It's working okay for me in the most recent nightly, and in subsequent hourlies.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7) > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20061121 > Minefield/3.0a1 ID:2006112121 [cairo] > > this has caused Firefox not to startup anymore. Do you mean after the patch was backed out?
Comment 13•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20061121 > > Minefield/3.0a1 ID:2006112121 [cairo] > > > > this has caused Firefox not to startup anymore. > > Do you mean after the patch was backed out? > Yes, there were startup probs (high cpu and memory, never came up all the way) after the patch was backed out by timeless...which persisted until the clobber by the nightly,
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•18 years ago
|
||
Looks like the change we were talking about on irc last night would have worked timeless - I just needed to do a new clean build instead of just remaking extensions/inspector. This uses the right syntax, and I don't have any strange issues like I used to have.
Attachment #245876 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #246311 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #246311 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #246311 -
Flags: superreview?(neil) → superreview+
Attachment #246311 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [checkin needed]
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago → 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [checkin needed]
Comment 15•18 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1pre) Gecko/20061203 SeaMonkey/1.1] (nightly) (W98SE) Would this patch apply to 1.8 branch ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #15) > [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1pre) Gecko/20061203 > SeaMonkey/1.1] (nightly) (W98SE) > > Would this patch apply to 1.8 branch ? It might, but I don't have 1.8 branch checked out.
Comment 17•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #16) > > Would this patch apply to 1.8 branch ? > > It might, but I don't have 1.8 branch checked out. Neil, could you advice/help ? Thanks.
Comment 18•18 years ago
|
||
Try installing the trunk .xpi into a branch build?
Comment 19•18 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061206 SeaMonkey/1.1] (nightly) (W98SE) I tried replacing the inside inspector.jar: DomI starts, but there are other "errors"... (Trunk and branch seem quite different.) I removed the line from the initial inspector.xul, and don't get the warning, as expected. What I can't test, and what I was (mainly) asking about, is the jar.mn (syntax) change.
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #19) > What I can't test, and what I was (mainly) asking about, is the jar.mn (syntax) > change. If you are using Seamonkey, you don't need to worry about the jar.mn change.
Comment 21•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 246311 [details] [diff] [review] v1.2 'approval-seamonkey1.1=?': (for the inspector.xul part only) Trivial U.I. code cleanup, no risk. (applies cleanly to v1.10.4.1)
Attachment #246311 -
Flags: approval-seamonkey1.1?
Comment 22•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 246311 [details] [diff] [review] v1.2 This is inspector code and effectively changes code that is for Firefox support, not SeaMonkey support, so SeaMonkey approval does not apply. Please ask for a1.8.1.2 or whatever inspector needs these days.
Attachment #246311 -
Flags: approval-seamonkey1.1?
Updated•17 years ago
|
QA Contact: timeless → dom-inspector
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•