Add classifications documentation

RESOLVED FIXED in Bugzilla 2.20

Status

()

Bugzilla
Documentation
RESOLVED FIXED
12 years ago
11 years ago

People

(Reporter: Kevin Benton, Assigned: Vlad Dascalu)

Tracking

2.20.1
Bugzilla 2.20

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment, 1 obsolete attachment)

v2
1.77 KB, patch
Frédéric Buclin
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(Reporter)

Description

12 years ago
We need to document how new admins use classifications.
(Assignee)

Updated

12 years ago
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.20
(Assignee)

Updated

12 years ago
Assignee: documentation → vladd
(Assignee)

Comment 1

12 years ago
Created attachment 213268 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

Well this is not much, but it's a start, and it fixes wrong information that we currently have in the 'Products' section.
Attachment #213268 - Flags: review?
(Assignee)

Updated

12 years ago
Attachment #213268 - Flags: review? → review?(documentation)
(Reporter)

Comment 2

12 years ago
Comment on attachment 213268 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

Please note "Bug Fiels" appears to be misspelled (missing d).  This can be fixed upon check-in.

Nice job thus far.  I think the documentation should explain editclassifications versus editcomponents and why we don't have an editproducts group.  I don't know if you feel we should deal with that in this update or in another (separate) update.  This is a great step in the right direction.  Thanks vladd :)
Attachment #213268 - Flags: review?(documentation) → review+
(Assignee)

Updated

12 years ago
Summary: Classifications are currently undocumented → Add classifications documentation
(Assignee)

Updated

12 years ago
Depends on: 224208

Comment 3

12 years ago
Comment on attachment 213268 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

>Index: xml/administration.xml

>+    <para>When activated, classifications will introduce an additional
>+    step when filling bugs (dedicated to classification selection), and they
>+    will also appear in the advanced search form.
>+  </section>

Missing close tag for the <para> tag.
Attachment #213268 - Flags: review-
(Assignee)

Comment 4

12 years ago
Created attachment 213388 [details] [diff] [review]
v2
Attachment #213268 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #213388 - Flags: review?(documentation)
(Assignee)

Comment 5

12 years ago
Thanks for catching that, Colin.

Kevin: yeah, maybe deal with that in another update, since I want to check in this as soon as possible, in order to remove the lie regarding 'products' = 'highest level of classification' from the bugzilla.org website.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
(Assignee)

Comment 6

12 years ago
LpSolit: you can also take a peak at this docs patch, if you have the time.
(Assignee)

Comment 7

12 years ago
Timeless too
(Assignee)

Comment 8

12 years ago
Anybody here? :)

Updated

12 years ago
Attachment #213388 - Flags: review?(documentation) → review+
(Assignee)

Comment 9

12 years ago
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/administration.xml,v  <--  administration.xml
new revision: 1.50.2.6; previous revision: 1.50.2.5
done

Checking in xml/administration.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/administration.xml,v  <--  administration.xml
new revision: 1.55.2.3; previous revision: 1.55.2.2
done

Checking in xml/administration.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/administration.xml,v  <--  administration.xml
new revision: 1.61; previous revision: 1.60
done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.