Closed
Bug 32871
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Lost DUP resolution for Mozilla bugs 32805, 32820, 20020...
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Bugzilla-General, defect, P3)
Bugzilla
Bugzilla-General
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: sidr, Assigned: justdave)
References
()
Details
After making bug 32805 a DUP of bug 29085, I discovered that a notation that it was a duplicate had been added to 29085 more than three hours previously -- but the View Bug Activity page for bug 32805 shows no sign that anyone had made any changes earlier. Given the time delay, the presumed earlier resolution should have been propagated to the shadow database long since; my change showed up immediately. No Mid-Air collision intercept occurred; since I first viewed 32805 less than five minutes before marking it as a DUP, none would be expected - the update of that bug should have been processed long since. This looks like data loss. I've seen a similar problem in the past when a Mid-Air collision has occured; the DUP notification seems to go through to the "other" bug before any change is made to the bug being changed, and, it appears, before the Mid-Air collision detection. This can lead to an orphaned notification, but unlike what happened with bug 32805, it is likely to be noticed at the time. Cc-ing ruth@innocent.com who apparently touched 32805 before I did.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Hmm. What happened here could be explainable if ruth@innocent.com does not have the "Can edit all aspects of any bug" permission, and the check for permissions happens after the notification has been made in the other bug. If so, the solution to both this problem and the similar problem with Mid-Air collisions would be to add the comment containing the notification to the other bug after, not before, all checks made before modifying the bug whose modification generates the notification. The draft "guide to screening duplicate bugs" at bug 30978 asks that a comment be added by anyone who notices a potential DUP, but only those with the appropriate permissions attempt to resolve it ... but I'd hardly expect everyone to read it once it is posted.
Target Milestone: ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
The same problem seems to have occurred in an attempt to mark bug 32820 as a DUP of bug 32819. This might be a symptom of a larger problem -- see bug 31898, "Resolution changes don't stick with multiple updates", filed by rhp@netscape.com, who presumably should not have permissions problems.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Again with the hmm. The same thing appears to have happened in bug 20020 yesterday, and in that case it was the owner of the bug who made the DUP resolution! See the 2000-03-21 16:40 comment by jrgm@netscape.com in bug 30878.
Summary: Lost DUP resolution for Mozilla bug 32805 → Lost DUP resolution for Mozilla bugs 32805, 32820, 20020...
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
The following was sent by e-mail by ruth@innocent.com: > This is what happened -- I tried to add a note to this effect but yet > ANOTHER bugzilla bug prevented me from doing so :( > 1. I tried to resolve #30978 as a DUP of #29085, because it practically > has DUP written all over it. > 2. I was told I couldn't (at this point I guess #29085 was wrongly > updated, which is the issue here) > 3. I tried to add comment "This is a dup of #29085" or similar to > #30978 > 4. Bugzilla tells me I don't have permission to change milestone > (which I haven't touched) from "" to "---", which looks like > Yet Another Bugzilla Bug (TM) > 5. I give up and mail the bug's owner > > I hope this was an isolated incident, and doesn't represent the tip > of an iceburg of permission-related Bugzilla screw-ups. > Nick. The problem noted in (4) appears to be bug 32748, "cant add comments in bugzilla if old [Milestone] value is empty". Thanks for replying.
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
tara@tequilarista.org is the new owner of Bugzilla and Bonsai. (For details, see my posting in netscape.public.mozilla.webtools, news://news.mozilla.org/38F5D90D.F40E8C1A%40geocast.com .)
Assignee: terry → tara
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7873 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
Verifying; the specific issues mentioned here are now part of bug 7873, resummarized as "duplicate isn't always resolved DUP when marking as such".
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
moving all closed Bugzilla bugs to the new Bugzilla product. This batch is DUPLICATE/INVALID/WORKSFORME/WONTFIX reassigning to default owner and QA in case of the bug being reopened. Clearing milestones, since we really shouldn't have them on these types of resolutions. Sorry for the spam everyone...
Assignee: tara → justdave
Status: VERIFIED → NEW
Component: Bugzilla → Bugzilla-General
Product: Webtools → Bugzilla
Version: other → unspecified
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•