Closed
Bug 331385
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
DHTML perf regression on the "zoom" test on 2006-03-15
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bzbarsky, Assigned: dbaron)
References
()
Details
The "zoom" DHTML regressed by 30% or so on March 15. Compare the times in http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1142434560.16763.gz and http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1142447880.24496.gz -- the former has: zoom: 748 748 748,748,747,748,750 while the latter has: zoom: 979 975 946,979,986,979,986 Current times for "zoom" are a little better (http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1143049080.13329.gz): zoom: 934 927 895,940,934,935,933 but still regressed. The initial regression happened in the following bonsai range: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2006-03-15+06%3A20&maxdate=2006-03-15+10%3A50&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot If you're on the CC list and you're not roc, then you have a checkin in that range... Note that the range is a few minutes too wide on either side, probably. My bets would be on bug 192767, bug 96394, or bug 318116. I've modified the "zoom" test so that it outputs the time when run standalone (see URL field). Unfortunately, I can't reproduce this slowdown locally. :(
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
I was planning to look into this today (I did a build-by-date last night right before these checkins).
Assignee: nobody → dbaron
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
See also bug 192767 comment 91 and bug 192767 comment 93.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce locally either, based on builds by date across just those three checkins, with a GTK2 build.
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
Joining the "can't reproduce" crowd: Comparing the previous nightly, and a tinderbox build from right after these checkins, and running the test 30 times on each of them, I get the following averages: Before: 724.7 After : 740.8 Which is about 2.2% percent increase - not even close to 30%, and probably statistically insignificant. (this is all on a G5 Mac)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce in a GTK1 build either. Note also that the Mac running Tdhtml didn't show an increase, although it was down for a few days when this happened (and it came back faster, although there could have been accumulated problems on the system slowing it down beforehand).
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
It looks like the fix for bug 331458 fixed this.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•