Closed
Bug 335409
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
lists.mozilla.org stopped accepting GPG-MIME messages
Categories
(mozilla.org Graveyard :: Server Operations, task)
mozilla.org Graveyard
Server Operations
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: dbaron, Assigned: justdave)
Details
Sometime between 2006-04-21 23:24 PDT and 2006-04-24 13:44 PDT, lists hosted on lists.mozilla.org stopped accepting GPG-MIME signed messages. Such messages have a Content-Type header like the following (with varying boundary):
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi"
(which is then transformed by the server into the first part of a multipart/mixed so it can append the footer)
I get a response from dev-*-bounces@lists.mozilla.org saying:
The message's content type was not explicitly allowed
with the message attached.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: server-ops → justdave
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Probably a result of bug 327300 .
AFAIK, Giganews and Google do accept GPG-MIME messages.
See <http://groups.google.com/group/netscape.public.mozilla.seamonkey/msg/b154db2e4a52e952>
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
OK, I've added multipart/signed to the list of accepted types. Let me know if it works. I suspect at this point that we might need one more type to add (does the signature itself has a special mime type?)
Chris: the message you linked to shows that GN and Google *do* allow GPG/MIME. (You said you saw the message that the other person said was signed).
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
My messages definitely were getting through to Google Groups, and that probably involves going through giganews, so I think everything accepts them.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
Is it working now?
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
I'll let you know the next time I have a legitimate reason to post...
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
I believe this is server-wide, so you can use test@lists.mozilla.org .
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> I believe this is server-wide
yes, it is.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
It now allows the message through but mangles the signature by removing the application/pgp-signature half of the multipart/signed part.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•19 years ago
|
||
OK, that's what I was suspecting would happen.
I've added application/pgp-signature as an allowed type. I'm going to assume that fixes it at this point, let me know if not.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•