Closed Bug 33581 Opened 25 years ago Closed 25 years ago

M14 won't run on Corel Linux.

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect, P3)

x86
Linux
defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED INVALID

People

(Reporter: sussman, Assigned: scc-obsolete)

Details

I've noticed bugs already posted about M14 not running on Caldera or Debian Linux; just add Corel Linux to the list. Corel Linux is actually a variant on Debian 2.1 anyway, so if you fix Debian portability, you'll probably fix Corel as well. When I unpack and run M14 I get: [bsussman@minos:/pub/package]$ ./mozilla .//run-mozilla.sh ./mozilla-bin MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/pub/package LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/pub/package:/usr/local/lib::/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/nspr/lib:/pub/oit SHLIB_PATH=/pub/package LIBPATH=/pub/package:.:/lib:/usr/lib MOZ_PROGRAM=./mozilla-bin MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=0 moz_debugger= ./mozilla-bin: error in loading shared libraries /pub/package/libxpcom.so: undefined symbol: __rawmemchr
-> XPCom for a look. maybe this is a packaging issue/ Build COnfig?
Assignee: cbegle → dp
Component: Browser-General → XPCOM
QA Contact: asadotzler → leger
I have no clue what this is. Scott ?
Meant to reassign to scc...
Assignee: dp → scc
I'm sure it's just the ancient libraries of Debian 2.1. They (and corel) don't have glibc2.1, which mozilla to my knowledge flatly requires. There are thread bugs in glibc2.0 that cause major suffering when mozilla pushes the c lib, and I think the decision nsus was that it was just hardly possible and certainly not useful to work around them (mozilla could effectively end up single-threaded). I'm think this is probably wontfix but I'll leave that up to scc to decide. sussman, corel for all it's shiny-newness has ancient versions of the core system libs. I'd recommend a different distro... Mandrake maybe as the next-easiest to install...
Thanks for the quick feedback, guys. I feel better at least knowing that it's a libc issue. It's your call at this point. Btw, I'm actually an experienced Debian user; I installed Corel at work because I was curious to see if/how they bastardized the Debian distro. :) Keep in mind that despite the fact that Debian 2.1 ("slink") has an old version of glibc, there's still a huge user base -- it's still the offical 'stable' release, and my impression is that most of the user base tends to be conservative about upgrades. Of course, this point may be totally moot by the time Mozilla hits beta. The current unstable Debian ("potato") has gone into feature-freeze and will be probably be released as the new 'stable' by summer. Poof, the glibc problem goes away. One last comment: kudos to the whole Mozilla team. I haven't run Mozilla since milestone 7 or so, and it crashed like mad. I used M14 on a RedHat 6.1 box today -- all day long -- and it only crashed twice. There's light at the end of the tunnel! Keep up the good work.
Resolving INVALID based on comments; glibc problem. Gerv
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
- Per last comments, age of bug, and no reopen - Marking Verified/invalid. Please reopen if still a problem.
verified
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.