337422 - CyberArmor Personal Firewall [@ cahooknt.dll + 0x7f0]

Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

Description

[timeless]

I was trying to open 24 windows as firefox was starting.
I have no idea why this function thought it was a good idea to get involved w/ spidermonkey, it normally interferes with networking activities.
For my reference, i'm using 3.0.405208

Incident ID: 18520696
Stack Signature	cahooknt.dll + 0x7f0 (0x100007f0) d1e344ae
Product ID	FirefoxTrunk
Build ID	2006050405
Trigger Time	2006-05-10 05:59:42.0
Platform	Win32
Operating System	Windows NT 5.1 build 2600
Module	cahooknt.dll + (000007f0)
URL visited	<a href='http://landfill.mozilla.org/ryl/random.html'>http://landfill.mozilla.org/ryl/random.html</a>
User Comments	
Since Last Crash	14 sec
Total Uptime	185880 sec
Trigger Reason	Access violation
Source File, Line No.	N/A
Stack Trace 	
cahooknt.dll + 0x7f0 (0x100007f0)
JS_SetPrivate   
js_DefineFunction   
JS_DefineFunction   
JS_DefineFunctions   
JS_InitClass   
js_InitObjectClass   
js_InitFunctionAndObjectClasses   
JS_ResolveStandardClass   
TempGlobalResolve   
js_LookupPropertyWithFlags   
js_LookupProperty   
js_GetProperty   
XPCWrappedNativeScope::SetGlobal   
XPCWrappedNativeScope::XPCWrappedNativeScope   XPCWrappedNativeScope::GetNewOrUsed   
nsXPConnect::InitClasses   
nsXPConnect::InitClassesWithNewWrappedGlobal  

jay: could you pull more details about this crash for me? I'd like to see if I can at least maybe figure out what was really happening.

I'm filing this in spidermonkey because that's where the top of the stack is I need to figure out if there's any reason spidermonkey might allow this evil hook to invade its calling area. If it's possible and if there's a way to avoid that, that's something to consider. It's also possible that the real stack doesn't look like that, although the stack seems fairly coherent otherwise....

Comment 1

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

timeless, I can't query on the stack as I get Bad Response from Server errors. What email did you use?

Comment 2

[Phoenix]

Is this still reproducible/actual?