Closed
Bug 338417
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Rendering of a CSS data URI image ignores no-repeat attribute
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Firefox
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: gjznituv+bugzilla, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
837 bytes,
text/html
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.3) Gecko/20060426 Firefox/1.5.0.3
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.3) Gecko/20060426 Firefox/1.5.0.3
In the example in the URL above, a Unipage-captured copy of Slashdot renders with the 'slc.gif' repeating even though its CSS is 'no-repeat'
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just view this Unipage and see the repeating rounded corners of the message headers.
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
From the source of the unipage URL:
.article div.title, .generaltitle div.title, #pollBooth div.title#poll-title { background: #066 url('<__cut__>'); Unipage: "//images.slashdot.org/slc.gif"; top left no-repeat; }
The problem is what does "Unipage: ..." do here? That's why you see this bug. It's a Unipage bug.
-> INVALID ?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Incorrect, it has nothing to do with the "Unipage.." attributes.
Remove them and the repeating remains the same. Even if you remove all "Unipage.." attributes from the page it still repeats the slc.gif.
You can check the URL again (I deleted the slc.gif ones manually).
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
.article div.future div.generaltitle div.title { background: #c33 url(''); top left no-repeat; }
Warning: Error in parsing value for property 'top'. Declaration dropped.
Source file: http://unipage.org/bugzilla/css_bug_slashdot.html
There is a problematic ";" after url(). I attach a testcase.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
Yes, of course you are right.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•