Closed
Bug 341860
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Language options: missing Hindi language
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization, defect)
Core
Internationalization
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: kaacper, Assigned: smontagu)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
4.81 KB,
patch
|
jshin1987
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pl; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pl; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 Firefox 1.5.0.4 POLISH: Missing Hindi (hi) language from Options > Advanced > General > Edit languages. Also, missing Kashmiri languages - both one written in Persian script and one written in Sharada script (rarely used). Don't know if ENGLISH or other versions are affected too. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Go to Tools > Options > Advanced > General > Edit languages. See if the language is there. Expected Results: Language: Hindi (hi) appears on the list. Language: Kashmiri (ks) appears on the list. Have no way to check if versions other than 1.5.0.4 POLISH are affected.
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → smontagu
Component: Preferences → Internationalization
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: preferences → amyy
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
I think that we deliberately didn't include any Indic languages because support is still incomplete and inconsistent from OS to OS. That's still true, of course, but I think we could go ahead and add them now.
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > I think that we deliberately didn't include any Indic languages because support > is still incomplete and inconsistent from OS to OS. That's what I thought at first and must have been the case in the 'first' round, but it seems that we forgot to add Hindi when other languages written in Indic scripts were added (e.g. Bengali) > That's still true, of > course, but I think we could go ahead and add them now. I fully agree. >
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
This patch adds Hindi, Kannada, Kashmiri, Malayalam, Oriya, Sinhalese and Telugu.
Attachment #229386 -
Flags: review?(jshin1987)
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 229386 [details] [diff] [review] patch I have a little reservation about Sinhalese and Oriya, but I guess it's all right. BTW, we may consider adding some of them (that need their own font menu entries) to the font menu in a follow-up bug. http://www.baraha.com/html_help/baraha/unicode_support.htm http://si.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Sinhala_Font_Guide#How_about_linux_font_installation.3F
Attachment #229386 -
Flags: review?(jshin1987) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Checked in. (In reply to comment #5) > BTW, we may consider adding some of them (that need their own font menu > entries) to the font menu in a follow-up bug. You're right, although the font menu is getting increasingly unwieldy.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
This has busted the Mac tinderboxen (at least those that have cycled since this patch). Should 'smHindi' in the nsMacLocale.cpp change be 'smDevanagari' to match what's defined in nsUnicodeMappingUtil.cpp ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
Yes it should, sorry about that. I have checked in a corrected version.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•