342250 - filter doesn't set Tags at filtered messages

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(MailNews Core :: Filters, defect)

Description

[Alexander Kluss]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060619 SeaMonkey/1.5a
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/2006061910 SeaMonkey/1.5a

When you define a filter that a message become a Tag (e.g. Important, To Do) this Tag wouldn't be set at the message. Other Flags (e.g. mark read) would be set.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1

[Jürgen 'JiHa' Harter]

(In reply to comment #0)
> User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1)
> Gecko/20060619 SeaMonkey/1.5a
> Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1)
> Gecko/2006061910 SeaMonkey/1.5a
> 
> When you define a filter that a message become a Tag (e.g. Important, To Do)
> this Tag wouldn't be set at the message. Other Flags (e.g. mark read) would be
> set.
> 
> Reproducible: Always
> 

Comment 2

[Jürgen 'JiHa' Harter]

Sorry for the last useless comment.

Just wanted to confirm bug for
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060620 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 SeaMonkey/1.5a

Comment 3

[Chris Ilias [:cilias]]

Is mailnews.downloadToTempFile set to true?

Comment 4

[Jürgen 'JiHa' Harter]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Is mailnews.downloadToTempFile set to true?

What do you want to tell us with this?

Comment 5

[Jürgen 'JiHa' Harter]

This seems to be a news-only problem.

I can set tags by filters for mails (tested with local folders).

But I can't set tags by filters for news.

Tested with
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060912 Mnenhy/0.7.4.10002 SeaMonkey/1.5a

Comment 6

[Jürgen 'JiHa' Harter]

With today's build setting tags by filters in news seems to work again. :-)

Testet with:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20061112 Mnenhy/0.7.4.10002 SeaMonkey/1.5a (official lhasa-gtk2-build)

Comment 7

[Karsten Düsterloh]

WFM as per comment 6.