Closed Bug 342831 Opened 18 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Simple way to jump to currently visible tabs with the keyboard

Categories

(Camino Graveyard :: Tabbed Browsing, enhancement)

PowerPC
macOS
enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: hwaara, Unassigned)

References

Details

I just got an idea for a nifty feature.

One of my friends was complaining the other day that cmd-number doesn't jump to the nth tab.  

Apparently, he has lots of tabs open, and likes to switch between - say - tab 2 and tab 12 easily.   

I find it hard to remember arbitrary numbers like that, so we could do something like this:

When a certain command is pressed down, say cmd-alt-ctrl, all tabs would "darken out" and show numbers on them.  Then you could go on to press cmd-alt-ctrl-number to go to that tab.  The details might need some work, but I think it could be very useful.
Summary: Simple way to jump to currently visible tabs → Simple way to jump to currently visible tabs with the keyboard
How would you go to tab 10+?
(In reply to comment #1)
> How would you go to tab 10+?
> 

You can't with this feature, it's only for the visible tabs.
Could we make it so that we lock focus out of the content area of all visible tabs while the numbers were up, and then you could just hit a number to jump to that tab? It'd be easier than hitting the shortcut once, then looking at a tab number, then hitting the shortcut plus the number again. Four-key shortcuts are REALLY challenging for most people.

cl
if we do tab expose, we could have #s be shortcuts for the first N tabs. just a thought.....
Another idea materialized: Make the Cmd-<num> feature visible by "darkening" them. We could show the shortcut above each bookmark (e.g., "Cmd-1" (with the real sign for "Cmd")).

Cl: in comment 3, do you mean that we could make it a "sticky" shortcut?
(In reply to comment #5)
> Another idea materialized: Make the Cmd-<num> feature visible by "darkening"
> them. We could show the shortcut above each bookmark (e.g., "Cmd-1" (with the
> real sign for "Cmd")).
> 
> Cl: in comment 3, do you mean that we could make it a "sticky" shortcut?

Basically, here's what I'm thinking would happen.

1) User hits some defined shortcut.
2) Camino overlays its entire window with a darker translucent layer, sort of an "inverse" Exposé. The tab bar would be its normal colour, with numbers overlaid on open tabs (the first 10, probably, to be reasonable).
3) User presses a number 1 through 0 to jump to the numbered tab, and the visual effect goes away, returning to normal browsing.

I basically envision what you described in the bug as an implementation of "tab exposé". Like Exposé, there's no reason we couldn't have multiple modes of exposing tabs, just as Exposé has multiple modes of exposing windows (per-app, global, or push everything out of the way so you can see the desktop).

cl
*** Bug 359629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The bug I just duped to this has some potentially interesting implementation ideas:

> So if I currently have the following tabs open it would function as follows:
> [Gmail - Inbox (3)] [Enter A Bug] [Google]
>
> I could hit option+tab to enable, then if I typed E it would bold the Enter A
> Bug tab and select it if I hit enter. If I instead paused a few seconds and
> then typed Gm it would select Gmail tab and then open it if I hit enter, etc.
This bug has been buried in the graveyard and has not been updated in over 5 years. It is probably safe to assume that it will never be fixed, so resolving as WONTFIX.

[Mass-change filter: graveyard-wontfix-2014-09-24]
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.