Open
Bug 343586
Opened 18 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
should preferences.xml and scrollbox.xml check the document in notify()?
Categories
(Toolkit :: UI Widgets, defect)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: moco, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1.84 KB,
patch
|
Gavin
:
first-review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
should preferences.xml and scrollbox.xml check the document in notify()?
here's the change in question:
>+ <method name="notify">
>+ <parameter name="aTimer"/>
>+ <body>
>+ <![CDATA[
>+ if (!document)
>+ aTimer.cancel();
>+
asaf writes:
This doesn't make sense to me, but as you noted this is also done in the
preferences bindings (with "new options dialog" blame comment). Keep this here
but please file a bug on this (for both bindings).
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → mano
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #247587 -
Flags: first-review?(gavin.sharp)
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 247587 [details] [diff] [review] remove it on trunk >Index: toolkit/content/widgets/preferences.xml >+ <![CDATA[ nit: trailing whitespace I wish I knew why this was added in the first place... r=me if you test to make that increasing the timeout and closing the window while the timer is active doesn't cause trouble.
Attachment #247587 -
Flags: first-review?(gavin.sharp) → first-review+
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: asaf → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•