Closed
Bug 343667
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Remove unused xpinstall installer bits
Categories
(Calendar :: General, defect)
Calendar
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mattwillis, Assigned: mattwillis)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
100.86 KB,
patch
|
jminta
:
first-review+
robert.strong.bugs
:
second-review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Now that we're using NSIS, the pieces from the old (and out of date) xpinstall installer can be removed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Removes files we're no longer using
Attachment #228182 -
Flags: first-review?(jminta)
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 228182 [details] [diff] [review] rev0 - removes old xpinstall files r=jminta, but I'm just going on instinct here. I'd like rob_strong to look over it too.
Attachment #228182 -
Flags: second-review?(robert.bugzilla)
Attachment #228182 -
Flags: first-review?(jminta)
Attachment #228182 -
Flags: first-review+
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
I know that the xpinstall based installer isn't working but are you sure you really want to remove the pre-existing code since it could be fixed and thereby give you an os/2 installer?
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > I know that the xpinstall based installer isn't working but are you sure you > really want to remove the pre-existing code since it could be fixed and thereby > give you an os/2 installer? I think an OS/2 or Linux installer are not critical. I'd rather remove the old stuff, focus solely on the Windows NSIS installer, and if we _really_ need xpinstall later, pull it from the CVS/Attic
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4) > I think an OS/2 or Linux installer are not critical. I'd rather remove the old > stuff, focus solely on the Windows NSIS installer, and if we _really_ need > xpinstall later, pull it from the CVS/Attic > Why are we removing this stuff rather than actually having the discussion about whether we want xpinstall? It seems we're doing work now when we're not sure we even want the work done.
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
If we keep nsinstall, we need to keep it working. So both ways take work.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6) > If we keep nsinstall, we need to keep it working. So both ways take work. So let's not double the work by maintaining an xpinstall installer?
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 228182 [details] [diff] [review] rev0 - removes old xpinstall files Cleanup is good. :P
Attachment #228182 -
Flags: second-review?(robert.bugzilla) → second-review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•18 years ago
|
||
patch checked in on MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH and trunk -> FIXED
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9) > patch checked in on MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH and trunk > > -> FIXED Removing Header.bmp and Watermark.bmp pissed off toolkit/mozapps/installer/windows/wizard. We need to figure out if we want that, and if not how to disable it. Backed out the part of the patch regarding those two files and the Makefiles. Did NOT back out all the xpinstall .jst removals. Reopening.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10) > Fixed the orange by deleting "installer.cfg" from Makefile.in. The need for the bitmaps for the wizard remains. I'm tempted to close this and worry about that later. -> FIXED
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago → 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 12•18 years ago
|
||
Mass move of all Installer bugs to General per ctalbert.
Component: Installer → General
Comment 13•18 years ago
|
||
The bugspam monkeys have been set free and are feeding on Calendar :: General. Be afraid for your sanity!
QA Contact: installer → general
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•