Closed Bug 345051 Opened 19 years ago Closed 19 years ago

DOS line endings were checked into nsSVGGlyphFrame.h rev 1.9

Categories

(Core :: SVG, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jwatt, Assigned: jwatt)

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

Please be very careful not to do this.
Attached patch patchSplinter Review
Attachment #229661 - Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #229661 - Flags: review?(tor)
Attachment #229661 - Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #229661 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #229661 - Flags: review?(tor)
Attachment #229661 - Flags: review+
Sorry about that.
No worries. I've done it myself. :-)
Something is odd about the way that nsSVGTextContainerFrame.{h,cpp} and nsSVGTextFrame.h were added - they checkout with the execute bit set.
I think they are the only files I've added. I just did a cvs add and a cvs commit. I'm using cygwin cvs.
Attached patch patch for cpp (obsolete) — Splinter Review
I managed to do the same thing in a couple of lines in nsSVGGlyphFrame.cpp too.
Attachment #229794 - Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #229794 - Flags: review?(tor)
Attached patch updated patchSplinter Review
also nsISVGGlyphFragmentLeaf.h :-(
Attachment #229794 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #229808 - Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #229808 - Flags: review?(tor)
Attachment #229794 - Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #229794 - Flags: review?(tor)
Attachment #229808 - Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #229808 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #229808 - Flags: review?(tor)
Attachment #229808 - Flags: review+
updated patch checked in.
Patches are checked in, so is this bug fixed now? I mean it should be marked fixed now, not?
yup
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: