Closed Bug 351019 Opened 19 years ago Closed 19 years ago

"Small icons" mode broken with the new FF2 theme

Categories

(Firefox :: Toolbars and Customization, defect)

2.0 Branch
x86
All
defect
Not set
major

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 348698

People

(Reporter: pascalc, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

(Whiteboard: [Fx2 theme change])

Tested with Firefox 2b2 winXP, Luna theme As pointed out (among other very valid points) by Jed Brown on his bog post (http://blog.jedbrown.net/?p=66), the new theme breaks funcionality when using small icons since the toolbar remains as big as <hen you use normal icons. The whole point of using small icons is to gain vertical space for people using low res/laptops. Marking severity as major since it is not only a visual problem but also breaks funcionnality we have in 1.5
Flags: blocking-firefox2?
It's not the theme's fault. The URL bar is bigger than both the large icons and small icons sets.
(In reply to comment #1) > It's not the theme's fault. The URL bar is bigger than both the large icons and > small icons sets. > When I say theme, I'm referring to the firefox theme, not the windows theme. Just clarifying
If we are no longer able to gain space using small icons, what's the point of having a small icons mode then?
Looks okay to me in yesterday's nightly. Bug 348698 fixed large icon mode to have the right padding, leaving small icon mode the same size as in b2.
(In reply to comment #1) > It's not the theme's fault. The URL bar is bigger than both the large icons and > small icons sets. > HUH? That makes no sense. The URL bar for me is a little bigger than the small icons but smaller vertically than the large icon set. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b2) Gecko/20060901 BonEcho/2.0b2 ID:2006090105 ~B
Whiteboard: [Fx2 theme change]
Comment 4 has it right; this was fixed by bug 348698. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 348698 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Flags: blocking-firefox2?
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.