Closed Bug 356515 Opened 18 years ago Closed 16 years ago

[docs] references for every xforms control

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: XForms, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)

References

Details

Attachments

(17 files, 17 obsolete files)

3.08 KB, text/plain
Details
1.45 KB, text/plain
Details
1.03 KB, text/plain
Details
1.63 KB, text/plain
Details
2.51 KB, text/plain
Details
1.79 KB, text/plain
Details
2.21 KB, text/plain
Details
4.12 KB, text/plain
Details
4.54 KB, text/plain
Details
1.74 KB, text/plain
Details
1.11 KB, text/plain
Details
1.08 KB, text/plain
Details
2.17 KB, text/plain
Details
1.61 KB, text/plain
Details
1.35 KB, text/plain
Details
3.49 KB, text/plain
Details
6.58 KB, text/plain
Details
The initial work have been done in bug 347610.
Attached file output (obsolete) —
Assignee: xforms → surkov.alexander
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #242135 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file output2
Same as the original file with some fixes for punctuation, spelling, and some English. Also, "analogous widgets are <code>text node for XHTML document and <xul:description/></code>" I would suggest changing the XHTML part to have the XHTML element that is most similar (probably xhtml:span). There really isn't a 'text node' in XHTML, is there? Just in DOM, which is used for all XML based languages and not just XHTML. Please verify that my other changes are ok with you.
Attachment #242135 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #242135 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file secret2
pretty much the same as the original document. I corrected some English, some spelling and some puctuation. I also added a caution that the data that is input with the 'secret' control will be stored in the instance data exactly as the user input it and that any other xform control bound to that data will show it 'as is'. I think a caution about that is important so that the user doesn't think some kind of encryption or other form of protection is applied to the data.
Attachment #243310 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243310 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file textarea2
just changed a few words around so that it read a little smoother. Left pretty much everything the same.
Attachment #243312 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243312 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file upload2
corrected the title, changed some wording.
Attachment #243319 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243319 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file range2
updated some of the wording/spelling. I still don't like the description for the 'step' attribute, but I can't think of a better way to put it.
Attached file trigger2
changed some wording.
Attachment #243328 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243328 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attachment #243324 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243324 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attachment #252296 - Attachment description: trigger1 → trigger2
Please review the changes I made to make sure that you agree with them. I'm fine with the documents as they are now so feel free to put them up when you are ready.
(In reply to comment #13) > Please review the changes I made to make sure that you agree with them. I'm > fine with the documents as they are now so feel free to put them up when you > are ready. > Thanks for corrections. They are fine. I uploaded files.
Attached file submit (obsolete) —
Attachment #252307 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
(In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=252291) [details] > output2 > Also, "analogous widgets are <code>text node for XHTML document and > <xul:description/></code>" I would suggest changing the XHTML part to have the > XHTML element that is most similar (probably xhtml:span). There really isn't a > 'text node' in XHTML, is there? Just in DOM, which is used for all XML based > languages and not just XHTML. I'm not sure, xhtml:span adds just inline layout element. AFAIK XHTML doesn't define any element, it just bring XML markup to HTML. Probably, we should ask someone else?
(In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Created an attachment (id=252291) [details] [details] > > output2 > > > Also, "analogous widgets are <code>text node for XHTML document and > > <xul:description/></code>" I would suggest changing the XHTML part to have the > > XHTML element that is most similar (probably xhtml:span). There really isn't a > > 'text node' in XHTML, is there? Just in DOM, which is used for all XML based > > languages and not just XHTML. > > I'm not sure, xhtml:span adds just inline layout element. AFAIK XHTML doesn't > define any element, it just bring XML markup to HTML. Probably, we should ask > someone else? > Doron and I couldn't think of anything better than span. Maybe <p style="display: inline;"/>? But span is still better. That is what people use it for. And that is the underlying control we use for xf:output on xhtml, so you really can't get a better element for comparison :-)
(In reply to comment #17) > Doron and I couldn't think of anything better than span. Maybe <p > style="display: inline;"/>? But span is still better. That is what people use > it for. And that is the underlying control we use for xf:output on xhtml, so > you really can't get a better element for comparison :-) > I changed on <xhtml:span/>
Attached file submit2
changed some of the wording. I also changed the analogous widgets section for both 'button' and 'clickable text' so please double check it to make sure that you are ok with my changes. Feel free to checkin if you are ok with my changes.
Attachment #252307 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252307 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
(In reply to comment #19) > changed some of the wording. I also changed the analogous widgets section for > both 'button' and 'clickable text' so please double check it to make sure that > you are ok with my changes. Feel free to checkin if you are ok with my > changes. > Thanks, in general I think I'm fine with analogous widgets. Uploaded.
Attached file select (obsolete) —
Attachment #255069 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file select 2
changed some wording. Corrected the title and link inside the text for 'copy'. Please review before checkin.
Attachment #255069 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #255069 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
(In reply to comment #22) > Created an attachment (id=258394) [details] > select 2 > > changed some wording. Corrected the title and link inside the text for 'copy'. > Please review before checkin. > Looks fine. Uploaded.
Blocks: 376307
No longer blocks: 353738
Attached file select1 (obsolete) —
Attachment #260892 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file label (obsolete) —
Attachment #260893 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file help (obsolete) —
Attachment #260895 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file hint (obsolete) —
Attachment #260896 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file alert (obsolete) —
Attachment #260898 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file message (obsolete) —
Attachment #260899 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file select1 #2
The language for your select1 documentation was really good. I fixed up some stuff like you were using 'select' instead of 'select1' a lot (you probably took the bulk of the code from the select page, I'm guessing). You didn't have the fact that when select1 is minimal we support both @selection="open" and xf:choices. This file is your original file with my updates. Ready for checkin, I think.
Attachment #260892 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260892 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file label 2
Fixed up some language. The original content was really good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260893 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260893 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file help 2
just some language changes, the original text was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260895 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260895 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file hint 2
just changed some language. The original content was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260896 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260896 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file alert 2
just changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260898 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260898 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file message 2
changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260899 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260899 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
(In reply to comment #32) > Created an attachment (id=298587) [details] > help 2 > > just some language changes, the original text was good. Ready for checkin if > you agree with the changes. > Alex, you should also change "modaless" to "modeless" in the text. I forgot to. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #30) > Created an attachment (id=298562) [details] > select1 #2 > > The language for your select1 documentation was really good. I fixed up some > stuff like you were using 'select' instead of 'select1' a lot (you probably > took the bulk of the code from the select page, I'm guessing). You didn't have > the fact that when select1 is minimal we support both @selection="open" and > xf:choices. This file is your original file with my updates. Ready for > checkin, I think. > Possibly you put my version here. I fixed select to select1 and selection="open" and checked in. Please look and do corrections if needed.
(In reply to comment #31) > Created an attachment (id=298580) [details] > label 2 > > Fixed up some language. The original content was really good. Ready for > checkin if you agree with the changes. > checked in
(In reply to comment #32) > Created an attachment (id=298587) [details] > help 2 > > just some language changes, the original text was good. Ready for checkin if > you agree with the changes. > checked in with modeless
(In reply to comment #33) > Created an attachment (id=298588) [details] > hint 2 > > just changed some language. The original content was good. Ready for checkin > if you agree with the changes. > checked in as is
(In reply to comment #34) > Created an attachment (id=298590) [details] > alert 2 > > just changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin > if you agree with the changes. > checked in as is
(In reply to comment #35) > Created an attachment (id=298591) [details] > message 2 > > changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin if you > agree with the changes. > checked in as is
Attached patch group (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #298644 - Flags: review?
Attachment #298644 - Flags: review? → review?(aaronr)
Attached file group 2
just a small language change. Ready for upload if you are ok with the change.
Attachment #298644 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #298644 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached patch switch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #298860 - Flags: review?
Attachment #298860 - Flags: review? → review?(aaronr)
Attached file repeat (obsolete) —
Attachment #298903 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attached file switch 2
changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #298860 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #298860 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attachment #298903 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Attached file repeat 2
Changed some of the language though the initial content was good. Please checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #298903 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #298903 - Flags: review?(aaronr)
I put the switch and repeat on wiki. Thanks for review. I'm happy we have complete documentation for our implementation of XForms controls.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Thanks for the hard work Alex! We owe all of our good documentation to you!
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: