Closed
Bug 356515
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
[docs] references for every xforms control
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: XForms, defect)
Core Graveyard
XForms
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)
References
Details
Attachments
(17 files, 17 obsolete files)
3.08 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.45 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.03 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.63 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
2.51 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.79 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
2.21 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
4.12 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
4.54 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.74 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.11 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.08 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
2.17 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.61 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
1.35 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
3.49 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
6.58 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
The initial work have been done in bug 347610.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Assignee: xforms → surkov.alexander
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #242135 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #243310 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #243312 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #243319 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #243324 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #243328 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Same as the original file with some fixes for punctuation, spelling, and some English.
Also, "analogous widgets are <code>text node for XHTML document and <xul:description/></code>" I would suggest changing the XHTML part to have the XHTML element that is most similar (probably xhtml:span). There really isn't a 'text node' in XHTML, is there? Just in DOM, which is used for all XML based languages and not just XHTML.
Please verify that my other changes are ok with you.
Attachment #242135 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #242135 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
pretty much the same as the original document. I corrected some English, some spelling and some puctuation. I also added a caution that the data that is input with the 'secret' control will be stored in the instance data exactly as the user input it and that any other xform control bound to that data will show it 'as is'. I think a caution about that is important so that the user doesn't think some kind of encryption or other form of protection is applied to the data.
Attachment #243310 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243310 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
just changed a few words around so that it read a little smoother. Left pretty much everything the same.
Attachment #243312 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243312 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 10•18 years ago
|
||
corrected the title, changed some wording.
Attachment #243319 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243319 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 11•18 years ago
|
||
updated some of the wording/spelling. I still don't like the description for the 'step' attribute, but I can't think of a better way to put it.
Comment 12•18 years ago
|
||
changed some wording.
Attachment #243328 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243328 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attachment #243324 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #243324 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attachment #252296 -
Attachment description: trigger1 → trigger2
Comment 13•18 years ago
|
||
Please review the changes I made to make sure that you agree with them. I'm fine with the documents as they are now so feel free to put them up when you are ready.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13)
> Please review the changes I made to make sure that you agree with them. I'm
> fine with the documents as they are now so feel free to put them up when you
> are ready.
>
Thanks for corrections. They are fine. I uploaded files.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #252307 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created an attachment (id=252291) [details]
> output2
> Also, "analogous widgets are <code>text node for XHTML document and
> <xul:description/></code>" I would suggest changing the XHTML part to have the
> XHTML element that is most similar (probably xhtml:span). There really isn't a
> 'text node' in XHTML, is there? Just in DOM, which is used for all XML based
> languages and not just XHTML.
I'm not sure, xhtml:span adds just inline layout element. AFAIK XHTML doesn't define any element, it just bring XML markup to HTML. Probably, we should ask someone else?
Comment 17•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Created an attachment (id=252291) [details] [details]
> > output2
>
> > Also, "analogous widgets are <code>text node for XHTML document and
> > <xul:description/></code>" I would suggest changing the XHTML part to have the
> > XHTML element that is most similar (probably xhtml:span). There really isn't a
> > 'text node' in XHTML, is there? Just in DOM, which is used for all XML based
> > languages and not just XHTML.
>
> I'm not sure, xhtml:span adds just inline layout element. AFAIK XHTML doesn't
> define any element, it just bring XML markup to HTML. Probably, we should ask
> someone else?
>
Doron and I couldn't think of anything better than span. Maybe <p style="display: inline;"/>? But span is still better. That is what people use it for. And that is the underlying control we use for xf:output on xhtml, so you really can't get a better element for comparison :-)
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #17)
> Doron and I couldn't think of anything better than span. Maybe <p
> style="display: inline;"/>? But span is still better. That is what people use
> it for. And that is the underlying control we use for xf:output on xhtml, so
> you really can't get a better element for comparison :-)
>
I changed on <xhtml:span/>
Comment 19•18 years ago
|
||
changed some of the wording. I also changed the analogous widgets section for both 'button' and 'clickable text' so please double check it to make sure that you are ok with my changes. Feel free to checkin if you are ok with my changes.
Attachment #252307 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252307 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #19)
> changed some of the wording. I also changed the analogous widgets section for
> both 'button' and 'clickable text' so please double check it to make sure that
> you are ok with my changes. Feel free to checkin if you are ok with my
> changes.
>
Thanks, in general I think I'm fine with analogous widgets. Uploaded.
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #255069 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 22•18 years ago
|
||
changed some wording. Corrected the title and link inside the text for 'copy'. Please review before checkin.
Attachment #255069 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #255069 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #22)
> Created an attachment (id=258394) [details]
> select 2
>
> changed some wording. Corrected the title and link inside the text for 'copy'.
> Please review before checkin.
>
Looks fine. Uploaded.
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #260892 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #260893 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #260895 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #260896 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #260898 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #260899 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 30•17 years ago
|
||
The language for your select1 documentation was really good. I fixed up some stuff like you were using 'select' instead of 'select1' a lot (you probably took the bulk of the code from the select page, I'm guessing). You didn't have the fact that when select1 is minimal we support both @selection="open" and xf:choices. This file is your original file with my updates. Ready for checkin, I think.
Attachment #260892 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260892 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 31•17 years ago
|
||
Fixed up some language. The original content was really good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260893 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260893 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 32•17 years ago
|
||
just some language changes, the original text was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260895 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260895 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 33•17 years ago
|
||
just changed some language. The original content was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260896 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260896 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 34•17 years ago
|
||
just changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260898 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260898 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 35•17 years ago
|
||
changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #260899 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260899 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 36•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #32)
> Created an attachment (id=298587) [details]
> help 2
>
> just some language changes, the original text was good. Ready for checkin if
> you agree with the changes.
>
Alex, you should also change "modaless" to "modeless" in the text. I forgot to. Thanks.
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #30)
> Created an attachment (id=298562) [details]
> select1 #2
>
> The language for your select1 documentation was really good. I fixed up some
> stuff like you were using 'select' instead of 'select1' a lot (you probably
> took the bulk of the code from the select page, I'm guessing). You didn't have
> the fact that when select1 is minimal we support both @selection="open" and
> xf:choices. This file is your original file with my updates. Ready for
> checkin, I think.
>
Possibly you put my version here. I fixed select to select1 and selection="open" and checked in. Please look and do corrections if needed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #31)
> Created an attachment (id=298580) [details]
> label 2
>
> Fixed up some language. The original content was really good. Ready for
> checkin if you agree with the changes.
>
checked in
Assignee | ||
Comment 39•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #32)
> Created an attachment (id=298587) [details]
> help 2
>
> just some language changes, the original text was good. Ready for checkin if
> you agree with the changes.
>
checked in with modeless
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #33)
> Created an attachment (id=298588) [details]
> hint 2
>
> just changed some language. The original content was good. Ready for checkin
> if you agree with the changes.
>
checked in as is
Assignee | ||
Comment 41•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #34)
> Created an attachment (id=298590) [details]
> alert 2
>
> just changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin
> if you agree with the changes.
>
checked in as is
Assignee | ||
Comment 42•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #35)
> Created an attachment (id=298591) [details]
> message 2
>
> changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin if you
> agree with the changes.
>
checked in as is
Assignee | ||
Comment 43•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #298644 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #298644 -
Flags: review? → review?(aaronr)
Comment 44•17 years ago
|
||
just a small language change. Ready for upload if you are ok with the change.
Attachment #298644 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #298644 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 45•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #298860 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #298860 -
Flags: review? → review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #298903 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Comment 47•16 years ago
|
||
changed some language, the original content was good. Ready for checkin if you
agree with the changes.
Attachment #298860 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #298860 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Attachment #298903 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Comment 48•16 years ago
|
||
Changed some of the language though the initial content was good. Please checkin if you agree with the changes.
Attachment #298903 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #298903 -
Flags: review?(aaronr)
Assignee | ||
Comment 49•16 years ago
|
||
I put the switch and repeat on wiki. Thanks for review. I'm happy we have complete documentation for our implementation of XForms controls.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 50•16 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the hard work Alex! We owe all of our good documentation to you!
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•