357886 - update our cnet editors choice from Nov 05 to Oct 06

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)

Description

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

update our cnet editors choice from Nov 05 to Oct 06

cbeard sent out a link to http://reviews.cnet.com/Firefox_2/4505-9241_7-32126746.html?tag=box

on our home page, we still have the Nov 05 award, see http://www.mozilla.com/img/firefox/awards.png

Comment 1

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

Attachment: screen shot of the web page

Comment 2

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

additionally, we would want to update the image and text on http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/press/awards.html as well.

Comment 3

[Reed Loden [:reed]]

sgarrity to fix.

Comment 4

[Steven Garrity [:sgarrity]]

Updated Firefox page image and image on awards page. Should be on the live site shortly.

Comment 5

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

note to self, ttp://www.mozilla.com/img/firefox/awards.png comes from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/

steven / reed:  does something special have to happe before the changes are live, or am I just not being patient?

Comment 6

[Reed Loden [:reed]]

(In reply to comment #5)
> steven / reed:  does something special have to happen before the changes are
> live, or am I just not being patient?

It's a huge pain to get stuff live, so we're trying to wait until we have a lot of stuff ready.

Comment 7

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

the images are good:

http://www.mozilla.com/img/firefox/awards.png (from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/)
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/press/award-images/cnet-editors-oct06.png (from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/press/awards.html)

thanks steven / reed!

but should we add this new award to the text of http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/press/awards.html?

(A new bullet point to "CNET Editors' Choice, October 2006", with a link to the cnet article?)

Comment 8

[Steven Garrity [:sgarrity]]

For the record, the text that Seth requested in Comment #7 is there now too.

Comment 9

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

> For the record, the text that Seth requested in Comment #7 is there now too.

verified.  

thanks again, steven and reed for fixing this.