Closed
Bug 360239
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
[Proto] Repeat until recurrence -> wrong default date
Categories
(Calendar :: Lightning Only, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: andreas.treumann, Unassigned)
Details
REPRODUCTION:
=============
- create a new event in the future and open the custom recurrence dialog
- the default date of 'Repeat until' is the current day
RESULT:
=======
- the created recurrence rule makes no sense.
EXPECTED RESULT:
================
- the default date should be the date of the new created event
REPRODUCIBLE:
=============
- always
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
> the default date should be the date of the new created event
admittedly selecting a better default prevents the default case, but it doesn't solve the problem completely. it doesn't prevent the user from manually entering a date that has already passed. as a result the first occurrence will still just disappear from the view. christian, any comments on this? it seems that this a case where we'd most probably come up with an error message. any other suggestions?
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
First, we should be have as suggested. The default date should be the date of the new created event.
Regarding the second issue. Well, I think it is Ok that users can manually
enter a date that has already passed. I wouldn't display a message here.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
If you enter a already passed date the plain text of the pattern is wrong. You get something like this: Occurs every day effective 11/14/06 until 11/09/06 from 10:30 to 13:00. Thats was I mean with "RESULT: - the created recurrence rule makes no sense."
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Regarding the second issue. Well, I think it is Ok that users can manually
> enter a date that has already passed. I wouldn't display a message here.
In case you save such an event it will disappear from the views, no change to get it back, it will simply be lost. I don't think this is something that should be allowed to happen.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Summary: Repeat until recurrence -> wrong default date → [Proto] Repeat until recurrence -> wrong default date
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Regarding the second issue. Well, I think it is Ok that users can manually
> > enter a date that has already passed. I wouldn't display a message here.
> In case you save such an event it will disappear from the views, no change to
> get it back, it will simply be lost. I don't think this is something that
> should be allowed to happen.
Yes, and moreover it bloats the data storage without any sense. I consider events without any occurrence being invalid. The providers could figure that out, but better the frontend code makes sure those can't be saved at all.
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: michael.buettner → nobody
Updated•18 years ago
|
Component: Lightning Only → Theme
Product: Calendar → Firefox
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 3
Version: Lightning 0.3 → Trunk
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Oh, crap, sorry, moving back, send hatemail to this address.
Component: Theme → Lightning Only
Product: Firefox → Calendar
Target Milestone: Firefox 3 → ---
Version: Trunk → Lightning 0.7
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Works for me using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.15pre) Gecko/20080521 Calendar/0.9pre. The default until date is the same as the start date.
I'd suggest to file a new bug for the 'user can set until date before start date' issue. Currently such an event will just be displayed on the start date.
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
Works for me using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081010 Calendar/1.0pre
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
Andreas, could you please test, whether you still see this on latest Lightning nightly builds?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
Checked in nightly build 20081103050551 -> WFM.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•