Release Notes For Bugzilla 2.22.2

RESOLVED FIXED in Bugzilla 2.22

Status

()

Bugzilla
Documentation
--
blocker
RESOLVED FIXED
12 years ago
12 years ago

People

(Reporter: victory <never@receive.bug.mails.i.hate.spammer>, Assigned: Max Kanat-Alexander)

Tracking

2.22.1
Bugzilla 2.22

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment, 1 obsolete attachment)

v2
1.09 KB, patch
Frédéric Buclin
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Comment 1

12 years ago
There is some information about 2.22.2 in the minutes of our last meeting:

http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings:2006-11-14

See the item "2.22.2 is essentially a bugfix release due to...". You could use it to write the release notes.
Summary: Release Notes For Bugzilla 2.22.2 → Release Notes For Bugzilla 2.20.4 and 2.22.2
(Assignee)

Updated

12 years ago
Summary: Release Notes For Bugzilla 2.20.4 and 2.22.2 → Release Notes For Bugzilla 2.22.2
(Assignee)

Comment 2

12 years ago
Created attachment 253277 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

Okay, here they are. Pretty straightforward.
Assignee: documentation → mkanat
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #253277 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
(Assignee)

Comment 3

12 years ago
Comment on attachment 253277 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

There's a tiny error in this--the XSS was introduced in 2.22, not 2.22.1.
Comment on attachment 253277 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

+A Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabiity was introduced in Bugzilla 2.22.1,

vulnerability

Comment 5

12 years ago
Comment on attachment 253277 [details] [diff] [review]
v1

Please update the section below and add the Version 2.22.x entries:

- Important Updates in this Point Release
  * Version 2.22.1
  * Version 2.22.2


>+Version 2.22.2
>+--------------
>+
>+A Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabiity was introduced in Bugzilla 2.22.1,

As maki said, there is a typo here. Moreover, the XSS was introduced in 2.22rc1 (so neither in 2.22 nor 2.22.1).


> Version 2.22.1
> --------------

The security notes are out of order. You first have those for 2.22, then for 2.22.2, and finally for 2.22.1. Choose one order or the other.

Else it looks good to me.
Attachment #253277 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review-
(Assignee)

Comment 6

12 years ago
(In reply to comment #5)
> (From update of attachment 253277 [details] [diff] [review])
> Please update the section below and add the Version 2.22.x entries:

  I'm ommtting those, they aren't necessary.
> As maki said, there is a typo here. Moreover, the XSS was introduced in 2.22rc1
> (so neither in 2.22 nor 2.22.1).

  Ah, okay. I'll just leave that bit out, then.

> The security notes are out of order. You first have those for 2.22, then for
> 2.22.2, and finally for 2.22.1. Choose one order or the other.

  Oh. I want them to be most-recent-first. But the note at the top is a general note.
(Assignee)

Comment 7

12 years ago
Created attachment 253649 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

Okay, I fixed the typo. I left the security stuff in the order it's in--the note at the top is a general note for all 2.22 releases, and the notes below are for specific point releases.
Attachment #253277 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #253649 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)

Updated

12 years ago
Attachment #253649 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
(Assignee)

Comment 8

12 years ago
Checking in docs/rel_notes.txt;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/rel_notes.txt,v  <--  rel_notes.txt
new revision: 1.36.2.7; previous revision: 1.36.2.6
done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Version: unspecified → 2.22.1
(Assignee)

Comment 9

12 years ago
And on the trunk:

Checking in docs/rel_notes.txt;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/rel_notes.txt,v  <--  rel_notes.txt
new revision: 1.43; previous revision: 1.42
done
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.