No details or 'check in' buttons appear on this airline check-in site



11 years ago
11 years ago


(Reporter: Michael Graubart, Unassigned)


Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)





11 years ago
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv: Gecko/20061230 SeaMonkey/1.1
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv: Gecko/20061230 SeaMonkey/1.1

This is the URL for online check-in with the EasyJet airline. I cannot see any way of avoiding the fact that it is specific to me and my current air-travel booking. If I log in, the next page fails to carry any flight details and has no 'check in' buttons. (The same is true with SeaMonkey 1.0.7.) If one uses Safari, one can carry on, but the resulting boarding pass does not show the booking and flight details. If, however, one uses Internet Explorer (the ancient one that is the last Mac one), everything works.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. The only way to follow through with this will be for someone to book a flight with EasyJet, register with a password and select 'Online Check-In'.
2. Log in with password.

Actual Results:  
A page that carries no flight details and no 'check-in' buttons appears.

Expected Results:  
A page showing the booked flight(s), each with a 'check in' button, should appear. Then a page with full booking and flight details should appear, which, when printed out, will act as a boarding pass.

eMac G4 (PPC), OS X 10.4.8.

Comment 1

11 years ago
I have discovered that at least the first stage of this check-in process does work with FireFox. It still does not work with the 10 January build of SeaMonkey 1.1 beta. 

Comment 2

11 years ago
The website may have changed (this airline has been taken over by another airline). The above URL takes me to a page where one can check details of bookings already made; as I have made none recently, I cannot test it any further. If, however, I go to to the EasyJet home page, everything there seems to work, both in SM trunk and in 1.1.2. But this does not confirm or deny that the check-in procedure now works.

Comment 3

11 years ago
if it is no longer "testable" probably the best that can be done is close it invalid
Last Resolved: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.