Closed Bug 376039 Opened 19 years ago Closed 8 years ago

Code needing reftests should be more clearly marked

Categories

(Testing :: General, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: humph, Unassigned)

Details

Many of my students, QA developers, new contributors, etc. would benefit from being able to quickly find cases requiring reftests. Perhaps A bugzilla query or page should be set-up to list such cases. Some good work has been made on this front, for example: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/reftest_opportunities_files
If you need a quick set of such bugs (at least 60 or so, I'd bet), pretty much any bug on which I've set in-testsuite? in Core:Layout (or other Layouty components) is reftestable, except for maybe ~5 bugs where I or others have specifically noted that more test-harness support is necessary. Also see anything which is a dependency of bug 300030 which has in-testsuite? set by ryanvm (who caught probably half the bugs fixed by the reflow branch which aren't in the automated test suite yet). I'm working through my backlog of email to set in-testsuite? on all the others which don't have tests yet, but it'll take awhile for me to finish that process.
I have added a "Layout bugs that needs a reftest" section with a couple of Bugzilla query links, hope that helps. http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/reftest_opportunities_files
Component: Testing → General
Product: Core → Testing
QA Contact: testing → general
Mass closing bugs with no activity in 2+ years. If this bug is important to you, please re-open.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.